Quadro P4000 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	129	171
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	91.97	25.19
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	N17E-G3	GP104
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	16 August 2016 (7 years ago)	6 February 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499.99	$815
Current price	$230 (0.5x MSRP)	$485 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1080 Mobile has 265% better value for money than Quadro P4000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	1792
CUDA cores	2560	no data
Core clock speed	1607 MHz	1202 MHz
Boost clock speed	1733 MHz	1480 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	100 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	94 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	283.4	165.8
Floating-point performance	9,068 gflops	5,304 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile and Quadro P4000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	241 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	10 GB/s	7604 MHz
Memory bandwidth	320 GB/s	192 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI	4x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support	+	no data
Display Port	no data	1.4
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost	3.0	no data
Optimus	no data	+
3D Stereo	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
VR Ready	+	no data
nView Display Management	no data	+
Optimus	no data	+
Ansel	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	+
CUDA	+	6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	113 +61.4%	70 −61.4%
1440p	69 +25.5%	55−60 −25.5%
4K	55 +22.2%	45−50 −22.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

60−65
+19.6%

50−55

−19.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	59 +5.4%	55−60 −5.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	78 +50%	50−55 −50%
Battlefield 5	115 +17.3%	95−100 −17.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	93 +38.8%	65−70 −38.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +19.6%	50−55 −19.6%
Far Cry 5	97 +42.6%	65−70 −42.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	129 +61.3%	80−85 −61.3%
Forza Horizon 4	108 +14.9%	90−95 −14.9%
Hitman 3	85−90 +20.3%	70−75 −20.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	194 +83%	100−110 −83%
Metro Exodus	140 +66.7%	80−85 −66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	92 +17.9%	75−80 −17.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 +24%	95−100 −24%
Watch Dogs: Legion	77 +37.5%	55−60 −37.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	52 −7.7%	55−60 +7.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	68 +30.8%	50−55 −30.8%
Battlefield 5	107 +9.2%	95−100 −9.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120 +79.1%	65−70 −79.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +19.6%	50−55 −19.6%
Far Cry 5	67 −1.5%	65−70 +1.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	91 +13.8%	80−85 −13.8%
Forza Horizon 4	106 +12.8%	90−95 −12.8%
Hitman 3	75 +1.4%	70−75 −1.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	178 +67.9%	100−110 −67.9%
Metro Exodus	85 +1.2%	80−85 −1.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	87 +11.5%	75−80 −11.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	42 −129%	95−100 +129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	142 +84.4%	77 −84.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	68 +21.4%	55−60 −21.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	53 −5.7%	55−60 +5.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	59 +13.5%	50−55 −13.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	66 −1.5%	65−70 +1.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +19.6%	50−55 −19.6%
Far Cry 5	77 +13.2%	65−70 −13.2%
Forza Horizon 4	102 +8.5%	90−95 −8.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	123 +16%	100−110 −16%
Metro Exodus	77 −9.1%	80−85 +9.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	74 +80.5%	41 −80.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	51 −9.8%	55−60 +9.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

83
+6.4%

75−80

−6.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	80 +40.4%	55−60 −40.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	85 +26.9%	65−70 −26.9%
Hitman 3	52 +23.8%	40−45 −23.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	32 +39.1%	21−24 −39.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	42 +27.3%	30−35 −27.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	46 +48.4%	30−35 −48.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	66 +53.5%	40−45 −53.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +28.6%	21−24 −28.6%
Far Cry 5	74 +39.6%	50−55 −39.6%
Forza Horizon 4	87 +42.6%	60−65 −42.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	89 +41.3%	60−65 −41.3%
Metro Exodus	74 +29.8%	55−60 −29.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 +23.2%	65−70 −23.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +25.6%	35−40 −25.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	37 +54.2%	24−27 −54.2%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	55−60 +9.4%	50−55 −9.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	45 +25%	35−40 −25%
Hitman 3	34 +41.7%	24−27 −41.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +22.2%	35−40 −22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	31 +40.9%	21−24 −40.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	51 +50%	30−35 −50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	31 +55%	20−22 −55%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27 +58.8%	16−18 −58.8%
Battlefield 5	52 +44.4%	35−40 −44.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45 +73.1%	24−27 −73.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Forza Horizon 4	61 +48.8%	40−45 −48.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	54 +50%	35−40 −50%
Metro Exodus	45 +50%	30−33 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21 +50%	14−16 −50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

39
+50%

24−27

−50%

This is how GTX 1080 Mobile and Quadro P4000 compete in popular games:

GTX 1080 Mobile is 61% faster in 1080p
GTX 1080 Mobile is 25% faster in 1440p
GTX 1080 Mobile is 22% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1080 Mobile is 84% faster than the Quadro P4000.
in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P4000 is 129% faster than the GTX 1080 Mobile.

All in all, in popular games: