Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1050 Mobile 1050 3 GB Max-Q 1050 Max-Q 1050 Mobile 3 GB 1050 Ti Mobile 1050 Ti Max-Q 1060 Mobile 1060 Max-Q 3 GB 1060 Max-Q 6 GB 1070 Mobile 1070 Max-Q 1070 SLI Mobile 1080 Mobile 1080 Max-Q 1080 SLI Mobile
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Pro WX 4100 Pro WX 4200 Pro WX 5100 Pro WX 7100 Pro WX 8100 Pro WX 8200 Pro WX 9200

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile with Radeon Pro WX 7100, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1080 Mobile
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
31.13
+78.2%

1080 Mobile outperforms Pro 7100 by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 1080 Mobile GTX 1080 Mobile
Pro WX 7100 Pro WX 7100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking175324
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.433.04
Power efficiency16.7110.82
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGP104Ellesmere
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 August 2016 (9 years ago)10 November 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499.99 $799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

GTX 1080 Mobile has 408% better value for money than Pro WX 7100.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602304
Core clock speed1607 MHz1188 MHz
Boost clock speed1771 MHz1243 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt130 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate283.4179.0
Floating-point processing power9.068 TFLOPS5.728 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs160144
L1 Cache960 KB576 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed10 GB/s1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI4x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD114
+90%
60−65
−90%
1440p71
+103%
35−40
−103%
4K55
+83.3%
30−35
−83.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.39
+204%
13.32
−204%
1440p7.04
+224%
22.83
−224%
4K9.09
+193%
26.63
−193%
  • GTX 1080 Mobile has 204% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 Mobile has 224% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 Mobile has 193% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+74.8%
100−110
−74.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+90%
40−45
−90%
Hogwarts Legacy 75−80
+108%
35−40
−108%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 115
+47.4%
75−80
−47.4%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+74.8%
100−110
−74.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+90%
40−45
−90%
Far Cry 5 91
+49.2%
60−65
−49.2%
Fortnite 143
+43%
100−105
−43%
Forza Horizon 4 108
+42.1%
75−80
−42.1%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+78%
55−60
−78%
Hogwarts Legacy 75−80
+108%
35−40
−108%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+87.3%
70−75
−87.3%
Valorant 188
+32.4%
140−150
−32.4%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 112
+43.6%
75−80
−43.6%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+74.8%
100−110
−74.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+21%
220−230
−21%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+90%
40−45
−90%
Dota 2 130−140
+28.7%
100−110
−28.7%
Far Cry 5 117
+91.8%
60−65
−91.8%
Fortnite 201
+101%
100−105
−101%
Forza Horizon 4 106
+39.5%
75−80
−39.5%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+78%
55−60
−78%
Grand Theft Auto V 119
+70%
70−75
−70%
Hogwarts Legacy 75−80
+108%
35−40
−108%
Metro Exodus 73
+82.5%
40−45
−82.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 115
+62%
70−75
−62%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 142
+168%
50−55
−168%
Valorant 186
+31%
140−150
−31%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 102
+30.8%
75−80
−30.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+90%
40−45
−90%
Dota 2 120
+11.1%
100−110
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 108
+77%
60−65
−77%
Forza Horizon 4 102
+34.2%
75−80
−34.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 75−80
+108%
35−40
−108%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 91
+28.2%
70−75
−28.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+39.6%
50−55
−39.6%
Valorant 137
−3.6%
140−150
+3.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150
+50%
100−105
−50%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+111%
35−40
−111%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+69.3%
130−140
−69.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+106%
30−35
−106%
Metro Exodus 44
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+2.9%
170−180
−2.9%
Valorant 183
+3.4%
170−180
−3.4%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 86
+62.3%
50−55
−62.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+106%
18−20
−106%
Far Cry 5 74
+76.2%
40−45
−76.2%
Forza Horizon 4 87
+85.1%
45−50
−85.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+81%
21−24
−81%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+107%
27−30
−107%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 88
+105%
40−45
−105%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+118%
16−18
−118%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+124%
30−35
−124%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Metro Exodus 27
+80%
14−16
−80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+88.9%
27−30
−88.9%
Valorant 178
+66.4%
100−110
−66.4%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 52
+85.7%
27−30
−85.7%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+118%
16−18
−118%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Dota 2 100−105
+53.8%
65−70
−53.8%
Far Cry 5 40
+90.5%
21−24
−90.5%
Forza Horizon 4 61
+84.8%
30−35
−84.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 33
+73.7%
18−20
−73.7%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 42
+121%
18−20
−121%

This is how GTX 1080 Mobile and Pro WX 7100 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 Mobile is 90% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 Mobile is 103% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 Mobile is 83% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1080 Mobile is 168% faster.
  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro WX 7100 is 4% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 Mobile performs better in 65 tests (98%)
  • Pro WX 7100 performs better in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 31.13 17.47
Recency 15 August 2016 10 November 2016
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 130 Watt

GTX 1080 Mobile has a 78.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Pro WX 7100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 15.4% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 7100 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 1080 Mobile GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
vs
RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Pro WX 7100 Radeon Pro WX 7100
vs
FirePro W9100 FirePro W9100
GTX 1080 Mobile GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
vs
RX 6600M Radeon RX 6600M
UHD Graphics 48EU UHD Graphics 48EU
vs
Radeon 820M Radeon 820M
Radeon 8040S Radeon 8040S
vs
Radeon 820M Radeon 820M
8600 GS GeForce 8600 GS
vs
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
Radeon 680M Radeon 680M
vs
GTX 1070 SLI Mobile GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
Quadro P4000 Quadro P4000
vs
GTX 1080 Mobile GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
E9550 MXM Radeon E9550 MXM
vs
GTX 1080 Mobile GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
GTX 650 Ti GTX 650 Ti
vs
GTX 980 SLI Mobile GTX 980 SLI Mobile
8300 GS GeForce 8300 GS
vs
GTX 980 SLI Mobile GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile
FX 5200 GeForce FX 5200
vs
GTX 980 SLI Mobile GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile
ATI FireGL V5000 FireGL V5000
vs
GTX 980 SLI Mobile GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 374 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 61 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile or Radeon Pro WX 7100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.