GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile vs Arc A550M
Aggregated performance score
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile outperforms Arc A550M by 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary Details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 213 | 197 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | Xe HPG (2020−2022) | Ampere (2020−2022) |
GPU code name | Alchemist | GN20-P0-R 6 GB |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 30 March 2022 (2 years ago) | 6 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed Specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 16 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1237 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2005 MHz | 1492 MHz |
Number of transistors | 21,700 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 8 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt (60 - 80 Watt TGP) | 60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP) |
Texture fill rate | 115.2 | no data |
Form Factor & Compatibility
Information on Arc A550M and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | no data | large |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | no data |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 96 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and Outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
API Compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12_2 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
OpenCL | 3.0 | no data |
Vulkan | 1.3 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile outperforms Arc A550M by 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Arc A550M outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile by 20% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 65−70
−9.2%
| 71
+9.2%
|
1440p | 30−35
−10%
| 33
+10%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
−113%
|
81
+113%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 45−50
−4.3%
|
45−50
+4.3%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 40−45
−4.8%
|
40−45
+4.8%
|
Battlefield 5 | 75−80
−5.2%
|
80−85
+5.2%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 60−65
−6.5%
|
65−70
+6.5%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
−68.4%
|
64
+68.4%
|
Far Cry 5 | 60−65
−33.9%
|
83
+33.9%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 60−65
−4.8%
|
65−70
+4.8%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 80−85
−3.8%
|
80−85
+3.8%
|
Hitman 3 | 70−75
−7.1%
|
75−80
+7.1%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 50−55
−5.9%
|
50−55
+5.9%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 35−40
−5.1%
|
40−45
+5.1%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 50−55
−5.8%
|
55−60
+5.8%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 45−50
−6.7%
|
45−50
+6.7%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 45−50
−4.3%
|
45−50
+4.3%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 40−45
−4.8%
|
40−45
+4.8%
|
Battlefield 5 | 75−80
−5.2%
|
80−85
+5.2%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 60−65
−6.5%
|
65−70
+6.5%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
−21.1%
|
46
+21.1%
|
Far Cry 5 | 60−65
−22.6%
|
76
+22.6%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 60−65
−4.8%
|
65−70
+4.8%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 80−85
−3.8%
|
80−85
+3.8%
|
Hitman 3 | 70−75
−7.1%
|
75−80
+7.1%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 50−55
−5.9%
|
50−55
+5.9%
|
Metro Exodus | 35−40
−7.7%
|
40−45
+7.7%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 35−40
−5.1%
|
40−45
+5.1%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 50−55
−5.8%
|
55−60
+5.8%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 50−55
−71.7%
|
91
+71.7%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 45−50
−6.7%
|
45−50
+6.7%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 45−50
−4.3%
|
45−50
+4.3%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 40−45
−4.8%
|
40−45
+4.8%
|
Battlefield 5 | 75−80
−5.2%
|
80−85
+5.2%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
−2.6%
|
39
+2.6%
|
Far Cry 5 | 60−65
−14.5%
|
71
+14.5%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 60−65
−4.8%
|
65−70
+4.8%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 80−85
−3.8%
|
80−85
+3.8%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 50−55
+6%
|
50
−6%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 45−50
−6.7%
|
45−50
+6.7%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 35−40
−5.6%
|
35−40
+5.6%
|
Hitman 3 | 35−40
−7.7%
|
40−45
+7.7%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−35
−6.5%
|
30−35
+6.5%
|
Metro Exodus | 21−24
−8.7%
|
24−27
+8.7%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
−5.6%
|
18−20
+5.6%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 30−35
−6.5%
|
30−35
+6.5%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 24−27
−3.8%
|
27−30
+3.8%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21−24
−8.7%
|
24−27
+8.7%
|
Battlefield 5 | 50−55
−5.7%
|
55−60
+5.7%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
Far Cry 5 | 40−45
−26.8%
|
52
+26.8%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 45−50
−4.3%
|
45−50
+4.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
−6.1%
|
50−55
+6.1%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
−32.1%
|
37
+32.1%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 18−20
−5.6%
|
18−20
+5.6%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 18−20
−5.6%
|
18−20
+5.6%
|
Hitman 3 | 21−24
−9.1%
|
24−27
+9.1%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
Metro Exodus | 14−16
−7.1%
|
14−16
+7.1%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 16−18
−12.5%
|
18−20
+12.5%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−8%
|
27−30
+8%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 12−14
−7.7%
|
14−16
+7.7%
|
Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−7.1%
|
30−33
+7.1%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 20−22
−5%
|
21−24
+5%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 21−24
−4.3%
|
24−27
+4.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
−6.1%
|
35−40
+6.1%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
This is how Arc A550M and RTX 3050 6GB Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 9.2% faster than Arc A550M in 1080p
- RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 10% faster than Arc A550M in 1440p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A550M is 6% faster than the RTX 3050 6GB Mobile.
- in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 113% faster than the Arc A550M.
All in all, in popular games:
- Arc A550M is ahead in 1 test (1%)
- RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is ahead in 64 tests (94%)
- there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)
Pros & Cons Summary
Performance score | 23.68 | 25.00 |
Recency | 30 March 2022 | 6 January 2023 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Chip lithography | 6 nm | 8 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 60 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Arc A550M and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with Similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.