RTX A500 vs Arc A370M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A370M with RTX A500, including specs and performance data.

Arc A370M
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
13.30

RTX A500 outperforms Arc A370M by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking386312
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.2220.23
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-128GA107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date30 March 2022 (2 years ago)10 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242048
Core clock speed300 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speed1550 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate99.20113.3
Floating-point processing power3.174 TFLOPS7.25 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs6464
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Cores816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A370M 13.30
RTX A500 17.59
+32.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A370M 5115
RTX A500 6764
+32.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD38
−31.6%
50−55
+31.6%
1440p21
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
4K40
−25%
50−55
+25%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
−30.4%
60−65
+30.4%
Elden Ring 35
−28.6%
45−50
+28.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−27.9%
55−60
+27.9%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Forza Horizon 4 74
−28.4%
95−100
+28.4%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−25%
45−50
+25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−21.2%
40−45
+21.2%
Valorant 50−55
−25%
65−70
+25%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−27.9%
55−60
+27.9%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Dota 2 42
−31%
55−60
+31%
Elden Ring 40−45
−25%
50−55
+25%
Far Cry 5 24
−25%
30−33
+25%
Fortnite 75−80
−26.7%
95−100
+26.7%
Forza Horizon 4 62
−29%
80−85
+29%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
−20.7%
35−40
+20.7%
Metro Exodus 13
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
−22.4%
120−130
+22.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−21.2%
40−45
+21.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−25%
50−55
+25%
Valorant 50−55
−25%
65−70
+25%
World of Tanks 170−180
−29.2%
230−240
+29.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−27.9%
55−60
+27.9%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Dota 2 66
−28.8%
85−90
+28.8%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−27.5%
65−70
+27.5%
Forza Horizon 4 53
−32.1%
70−75
+32.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
−22.4%
120−130
+22.4%
Valorant 50−55
−25%
65−70
+25%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 11
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Elden Ring 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
−31.3%
130−140
+31.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
World of Tanks 90−95
−27.7%
120−130
+27.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−29%
40−45
+29%
Forza Horizon 4 37
−21.6%
45−50
+21.6%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Valorant 30−35
−21.2%
40−45
+21.2%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Dota 2 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
Elden Ring 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−28.2%
50−55
+28.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 40
−25%
50−55
+25%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Fortnite 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Valorant 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%

This is how Arc A370M and RTX A500 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A500 is 32% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A500 is 29% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A500 is 25% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.30 17.59
Recency 30 March 2022 10 November 2021
Chip lithography 6 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 60 Watt

Arc A370M has an age advantage of 4 months, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 71.4% lower power consumption.

RTX A500, on the other hand, has a 32.3% higher aggregate performance score.

The RTX A500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A370M in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A370M is a notebook card while RTX A500 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A370M
Arc A370M
NVIDIA RTX A500
RTX A500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 166 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 139 votes

Rate RTX A500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.