RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Arc A370M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A370M with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

Arc A370M
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
13.23

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms Arc A370M by a whopping 241% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking39378
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data87.73
Power efficiency26.0844.44
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-128AD107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date30 March 2022 (2 years ago)12 February 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242816
Core clock speed300 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed1550 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate99.20187.4
Floating-point processing power3.174 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs6488
Tensor Coresno data88
Ray Tracing Cores822

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc A370M 13.23
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 45.09
+241%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A370M 5115
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17436
+241%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD39
−233%
130−140
+233%
1440p20
−225%
65−70
+225%
4K34
−224%
110−120
+224%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.99
1440pno data9.98
4Kno data5.90

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 56
−239%
190−200
+239%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−226%
75−80
+226%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
−226%
150−160
+226%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 42
−233%
140−150
+233%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−233%
180−190
+233%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−226%
75−80
+226%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
−224%
120−130
+224%
Far Cry 5 49
−227%
160−170
+227%
Fortnite 70−75
−233%
240−250
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−240%
180−190
+240%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−233%
110−120
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−233%
150−160
+233%
Valorant 100−110
−221%
350−400
+221%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24
−233%
80−85
+233%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−233%
180−190
+233%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−226%
75−80
+226%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
−213%
550−600
+213%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
−240%
85−90
+240%
Dota 2 68
−238%
230−240
+238%
Far Cry 5 46
−226%
150−160
+226%
Fortnite 70−75
−233%
240−250
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−240%
180−190
+240%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−233%
110−120
+233%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
−228%
95−100
+228%
Metro Exodus 34
−224%
110−120
+224%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−233%
150−160
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
−240%
180−190
+240%
Valorant 100−110
−221%
350−400
+221%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−233%
180−190
+233%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−226%
75−80
+226%
Cyberpunk 2077 21
−233%
70−75
+233%
Dota 2 66
−233%
220−230
+233%
Far Cry 5 43
−226%
140−150
+226%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−240%
180−190
+240%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−233%
110−120
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−233%
150−160
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
−227%
85−90
+227%
Valorant 100−110
−221%
350−400
+221%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
−233%
240−250
+233%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 90−95
−219%
300−310
+219%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
−218%
35−40
+218%
Metro Exodus 20
−225%
65−70
+225%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
−213%
300−310
+213%
Valorant 130−140
−238%
450−500
+238%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−224%
110−120
+224%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−233%
50−55
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Far Cry 5 29
−228%
95−100
+228%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−233%
100−105
+233%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−218%
70−75
+218%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−216%
60−65
+216%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
−233%
90−95
+233%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−233%
80−85
+233%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−213%
50−55
+213%
Valorant 65−70
−228%
220−230
+228%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−224%
55−60
+224%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Dota 2 40
−225%
130−140
+225%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−218%
70−75
+218%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%

This is how Arc A370M and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 233% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 225% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 224% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.23 45.09
Recency 30 March 2022 12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 70 Watt

Arc A370M has 100% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 240.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A370M in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A370M is a notebook card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A370M
Arc A370M
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 168 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 29 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc A370M or RTX 2000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.