RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Arc A530M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A530M with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

Arc A530M
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 65 Watt
19.00

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms Arc A530M by a whopping 115% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking306106
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data36.46
Power efficiency22.2944.60
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-256AD107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 August 2023 (2 years ago)12 February 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15362816
Core clock speed900 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistors11,500 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate124.8187.4
Floating-point processing power3.994 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs4848
TMUs9688
Tensor Cores19288
Ray Tracing Cores1222

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc A530M 19.00
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 40.94
+115%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A530M 7963
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17156
+115%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−109%
230−240
+109%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−107%
85−90
+107%
God of War 40−45
−113%
85−90
+113%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−113%
170−180
+113%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−109%
230−240
+109%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−107%
85−90
+107%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−106%
130−140
+106%
Fortnite 100−110
−106%
210−220
+106%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−115%
170−180
+115%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
−113%
130−140
+113%
God of War 40−45
−113%
85−90
+113%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−103%
150−160
+103%
Valorant 140−150
−107%
300−310
+107%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−113%
170−180
+113%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−109%
230−240
+109%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
−115%
500−550
+115%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−107%
85−90
+107%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−106%
130−140
+106%
Fortnite 100−110
−106%
210−220
+106%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−115%
170−180
+115%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
−113%
130−140
+113%
God of War 40−45
−113%
85−90
+113%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
−108%
150−160
+108%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−107%
85−90
+107%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−103%
150−160
+103%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−104%
110−120
+104%
Valorant 140−150
−107%
300−310
+107%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−113%
170−180
+113%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−107%
85−90
+107%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−106%
130−140
+106%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−115%
170−180
+115%
God of War 40−45
−113%
85−90
+113%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−103%
150−160
+103%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−104%
110−120
+104%
Valorant 140−150
−107%
300−310
+107%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
−106%
210−220
+106%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−105%
80−85
+105%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−114%
300−310
+114%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−112%
70−75
+112%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−100%
50−55
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−105%
350−400
+105%
Valorant 180−190
−94.4%
350−400
+94.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−100%
110−120
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−109%
90−95
+109%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−108%
100−105
+108%
God of War 21−24
−105%
45−50
+105%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−100%
60−65
+100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
−111%
95−100
+111%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−106%
35−40
+106%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−114%
75−80
+114%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−87.5%
30−33
+87.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−114%
60−65
+114%
Valorant 110−120
−109%
230−240
+109%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−107%
60−65
+107%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−106%
35−40
+106%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−100%
16−18
+100%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−105%
45−50
+105%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−106%
70−75
+106%
God of War 14−16
−100%
30−33
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−111%
40−45
+111%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 20−22
−100%
40−45
+100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.00 40.94
Recency 1 August 2023 12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 70 Watt

Arc A530M has 7.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 115.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A530M in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A530M is a notebook graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A530M
Arc A530M
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 213 votes

Rate Arc A530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 52 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc A530M or RTX 2000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.