RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Arc A730M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A730M with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

Arc A730M
2022
12 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
23.62

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms Arc A730M by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking23084
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data92.97
Power efficiency21.6743.98
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-512AD107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2022 (3 years ago)12 February 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30722816
Core clock speed1100 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate393.6187.4
Floating-point processing power12.6 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs19288
Tensor Cores38488
Ray Tracing Cores2422

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB16 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc A730M 23.62
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 41.95
+77.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A730M 9808
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17416
+77.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD74
−75.7%
130−140
+75.7%
1440p45
−66.7%
75−80
+66.7%
4K22
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.99
1440pno data8.65
4Kno data18.54

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 169
−77.5%
300−310
+77.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
−69%
120−130
+69%
Hogwarts Legacy 70
−71.4%
120−130
+71.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−105
−70%
170−180
+70%
Counter-Strike 2 155
−74.2%
270−280
+74.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 64
−71.9%
110−120
+71.9%
Far Cry 5 93
−72%
160−170
+72%
Fortnite 120−130
−77.4%
220−230
+77.4%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−68.3%
170−180
+68.3%
Forza Horizon 5 86
−74.4%
150−160
+74.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 49
−73.5%
85−90
+73.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
−70%
170−180
+70%
Valorant 170−180
−74.4%
300−310
+74.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−105
−70%
170−180
+70%
Counter-Strike 2 98
−73.5%
170−180
+73.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
−71.8%
450−500
+71.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
−75.9%
95−100
+75.9%
Dota 2 90
−66.7%
150−160
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 86
−74.4%
150−160
+74.4%
Fortnite 120−130
−77.4%
220−230
+77.4%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−68.3%
170−180
+68.3%
Forza Horizon 5 80
−75%
140−150
+75%
Grand Theft Auto V 72
−66.7%
120−130
+66.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 44
−70.5%
75−80
+70.5%
Metro Exodus 43
−74.4%
75−80
+74.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
−70%
170−180
+70%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110
−72.7%
190−200
+72.7%
Valorant 170−180
−74.4%
300−310
+74.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−105
−70%
170−180
+70%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
−73.1%
90−95
+73.1%
Dota 2 80
−75%
140−150
+75%
Far Cry 5 81
−72.8%
140−150
+72.8%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−68.3%
170−180
+68.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 34
−76.5%
60−65
+76.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
−70%
170−180
+70%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
−66.7%
75−80
+66.7%
Valorant 102
−76.5%
180−190
+76.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 120−130
−77.4%
220−230
+77.4%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 53
−69.8%
90−95
+69.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
−67.6%
300−310
+67.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
−70.2%
80−85
+70.2%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−76.5%
60−65
+76.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−71.4%
300−310
+71.4%
Valorant 210−220
−65.9%
350−400
+65.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−69%
120−130
+69%
Cyberpunk 2077 31
−77.4%
55−60
+77.4%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−72.4%
100−105
+72.4%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−64.2%
110−120
+64.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
−72.4%
50−55
+72.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−74.4%
75−80
+74.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65
−77.4%
110−120
+77.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 34
−76.5%
60−65
+76.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Metro Exodus 21
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−71.1%
65−70
+71.1%
Valorant 150−160
−73.3%
260−270
+73.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−66.7%
65−70
+66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−73.1%
45−50
+73.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Dota 2 80−85
−70.7%
140−150
+70.7%
Far Cry 5 35
−71.4%
60−65
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−66.7%
75−80
+66.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−60.7%
45−50
+60.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
−60.7%
45−50
+60.7%

This is how Arc A730M and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 76% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 67% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 59% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.62 41.95
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a 77.6% higher aggregate performance score, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 14.3% lower power consumption.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A730M in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A730M is a notebook card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A730M
Arc A730M
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 113 votes

Rate Arc A730M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 40 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc A730M or RTX 2000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.