RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs Arc A370M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A370M with RTX 4000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

Arc A370M
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
13.26

RTX 4000 Ada Generation outperforms Arc A370M by a whopping 385% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking38329
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.1934.17
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-128AD104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date30 March 2022 (2 years ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10246144
Core clock speed300 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1550 MHz2175 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate99.20417.6
Floating-point processing power3.174 TFLOPS26.73 TFLOPS
ROPs3280
TMUs64192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Cores848

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB20 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s360.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A370M 13.26
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 64.26
+385%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A370M 5115
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 24788
+385%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40
−375%
190−200
+375%
1440p21
−376%
100−110
+376%
4K34
−371%
160−170
+371%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 46
−378%
220−230
+378%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−372%
170−180
+372%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 33
−355%
150−160
+355%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−371%
240−250
+371%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−369%
150−160
+369%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
−359%
170−180
+359%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−359%
170−180
+359%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−365%
200−210
+365%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−341%
450−500
+341%
Hitman 3 30−33
−367%
140−150
+367%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−338%
350−400
+338%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−381%
260−270
+381%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−365%
200−210
+365%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−371%
240−250
+371%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−338%
350−400
+338%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−372%
170−180
+372%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20
−375%
95−100
+375%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−371%
240−250
+371%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−369%
150−160
+369%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
−380%
120−130
+380%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−359%
170−180
+359%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−365%
200−210
+365%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−341%
450−500
+341%
Hitman 3 30−33
−367%
140−150
+367%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−338%
350−400
+338%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−381%
260−270
+381%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−365%
200−210
+365%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 62
−384%
300−310
+384%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−359%
170−180
+359%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−338%
350−400
+338%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−372%
170−180
+372%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18
−372%
85−90
+372%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−369%
150−160
+369%
Cyberpunk 2077 21
−376%
100−105
+376%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−359%
170−180
+359%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−341%
450−500
+341%
Hitman 3 30−33
−367%
140−150
+367%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−338%
350−400
+338%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 53
−372%
250−260
+372%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
−362%
120−130
+362%
Watch Dogs: Legion 15
−367%
70−75
+367%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−365%
200−210
+365%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−384%
150−160
+384%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−358%
110−120
+358%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−369%
75−80
+369%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
−362%
60−65
+362%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−371%
80−85
+371%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−372%
85−90
+372%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−376%
400−450
+376%
Hitman 3 18−20
−374%
90−95
+374%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−369%
150−160
+369%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−364%
130−140
+364%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 37
−359%
170−180
+359%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−371%
80−85
+371%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
−369%
450−500
+369%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−362%
120−130
+362%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−367%
70−75
+367%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−358%
55−60
+358%
Hitman 3 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−338%
350−400
+338%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−369%
75−80
+369%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−367%
70−75
+367%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−376%
100−105
+376%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−369%
75−80
+369%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−364%
65−70
+364%

This is how Arc A370M and RTX 4000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 375% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 376% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 371% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.26 64.26
Recency 30 March 2022 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 130 Watt

Arc A370M has 271.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 384.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A370M in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A370M is a notebook card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A370M
Arc A370M
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 163 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 36 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.