VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Primary details
Comparing VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2932 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | VIA | C7-M |
| Power efficiency | 1.62 | no data |
| Architecture codename | CNQ (2011) | Esther |
| Release date | 17 May 2011 (13 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.46 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1333 MHz | 533 MHz |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 132 mm2 | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27.5 Watt | 20 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 20 Watt |
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.
VIA C7-M C7-M-2000, on the other hand, has 35% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
