VIA Nano U2250 vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Aggregate performance score
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 outperforms VIA Nano U2250 by a whopping 318% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and VIA Nano U2250 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2938 | 3376 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | VIA | VIA Nano |
| Power efficiency | 1.60 | 1.05 |
| Architecture codename | CNQ (2011) | Isaiah (2009) |
| Release date | 17 May 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 January 2009 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and VIA Nano U2250 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.46 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1333 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 132 mm2 | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and VIA Nano U2250 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA | NanoBGA2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27.5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.46 | 0.11 |
| Recency | 17 May 2011 | 1 January 2009 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 10 Watt |
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 has a 318.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.
VIA Nano U2250, on the other hand, has 170% lower power consumption.
The VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is our recommended choice as it beats the VIA Nano U2250 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and VIA Nano U2250, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
