UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now no data
Games supported 58%
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
Buy
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed 350
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
Buy
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed 350
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
Price now no data
Games supported 62%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating749576
ArchitectureGen. 11 (2021)Gen. 12 (2021)
GPU code nameGen. 11Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 January 2021
(2 years old)
30 March 2021
(1 year old)

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2432
Core clock speed350 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz1450 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm14 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)4.8 - 10 Wattno data

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory++

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync++

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX12_1DirectX 12_1

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 2.12
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 4.07
+92%
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 16%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 1458
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 3322
+128%

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) by 128% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 8388
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 12523
+49.3%

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) by 49% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark coverage: 13%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 1043
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 2227
+114%

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) by 114% in 3DMark Fire Strike Score.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 1106
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 2493
+125%

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) by 125% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12
−33.3%
16
+33.3%

Popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−500%
18
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 0−1 14
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 7−8
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−225%
13
+225%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−433%
16
+433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 0−1 13
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 7−8
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−100%
6
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
+0%
8−9
+0%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−400%
15
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 0−1 12
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 7−8
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−100%
8−9
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Hitman 3 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Hitman 3 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 2−3
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 1−2
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 2.12 4.07
Recency 11 January 2021 30 March 2021
Pipelines / CUDA cores 24 32
Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends

Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

since it shows better performance.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 13 ratings

Rate Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 13 ratings

Rate Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.