UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs and UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
2021
4.31

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking675644
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3232
Core clock speed350 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz1450 MHz
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 4.31
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 4.72
+9.5%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 3322
+4.9%
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 3168

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 2493
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 2495
+0.1%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 12523
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 15716
+25.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
−6.3%
17
+6.3%
1440p21−24
−19%
25
+19%
4K10−12
−20%
12
+20%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 11
+0%
11
+0%
Battlefield 5 18
+50%
12−14
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 14
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−7.4%
27−30
+7.4%
Hitman 3 16
+60%
10
−60%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−6.9%
30−35
+6.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 13
−15.4%
15
+15.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−6.8%
47
+6.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9
+0%
9
+0%
Battlefield 5 16
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 13
+30%
10−11
−30%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−7.4%
27−30
+7.4%
Hitman 3 12
+33.3%
9
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−6.9%
30−35
+6.9%
Metro Exodus 6
−167%
16
+167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4
−200%
12−14
+200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−6.3%
17
+6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+2.3%
43
−2.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Battlefield 5 15
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Far Cry 5 12
+20%
10−11
−20%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−7.4%
27−30
+7.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+113%
8
−113%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−2.3%
45−50
+2.3%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 1−2

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 22
+0%
22
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hitman 3 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10
+0%
10
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+0%
16
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs and UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 6% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 19% faster in 1440p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 20% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is 113% faster.
  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is ahead in 9 tests (13%)
  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is ahead in 22 tests (33%)
  • there's a draw in 36 tests (54%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.31 4.72
Recency 30 March 2021 11 May 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has a 9.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs and UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H).


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 30 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.