UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Aggregated performance score
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary Details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 615 | 624 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) | Gen. 12 (2021) |
| GPU code name | Tiger Lake Xe | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 August 2020 (3 years ago) | 30 March 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed Specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 48 | 32 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz | 1450 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Supported GPU Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | + |
API Compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | DirectX 12_1 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs by 6% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs outperforms UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs by 7% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs by 28% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 17
+6.3%
| 16
−6.3%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 11
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 12
+9.1%
|
11
−9.1%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 19
+5.6%
|
18
−5.6%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 16
+14.3%
|
14
−14.3%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+7.7%
|
12−14
−7.7%
|
| Hitman 3 | 16
+0%
|
16
+0%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
−44.4%
|
13
+44.4%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 12
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 3−4
−200%
|
9
+200%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 16
+0%
|
16
+0%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 15
+15.4%
|
13
−15.4%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+7.7%
|
12−14
−7.7%
|
| Hitman 3 | 8
−50%
|
12
+50%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6−7
+0%
|
6
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
+125%
|
4
−125%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 15
+66.7%
|
9−10
−66.7%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 14
−7.1%
|
15
+7.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14
+16.7%
|
12
−16.7%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+7.7%
|
12−14
−7.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Hitman 3 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Hitman 3 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
This is how UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is 6.3% faster than UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is 125% faster than the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs.
- in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is 200% faster than the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs.
All in all, in popular games:
- UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is ahead in 13 tests (24%)
- UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is ahead in 5 tests (9%)
- there's a draw in 36 tests (67%)
Pros & Cons Summary
| Performance score | 4.53 | 4.39 |
| Recency | 15 August 2020 | 30 March 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with Similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
