Radeon RX 6500 vs T1200 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 95 Watt
19.94
+1.5%

T1200 Mobile outperforms Radeon RX 6500 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking259266
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed855 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1425 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on T1200 Mobile and Radeon RX 6500 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed10000 MHzno data
Shared memory-no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_1no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD56
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
1440p35
+16.7%
30−35
−16.7%
4K95
+5.6%
90−95
−5.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 47
+38.2%
30−35
−38.2%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+1.5%
65−70
−1.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+2.3%
40−45
−2.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+1.9%
50−55
−1.9%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+1.6%
60−65
−1.6%
Hitman 3 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 109
+70.3%
60−65
−70.3%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+1.9%
50−55
−1.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 89
+56.1%
55−60
−56.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 54
+50%
35−40
−50%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 28
−21.4%
30−35
+21.4%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+1.5%
65−70
−1.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+2.3%
40−45
−2.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Far Cry 5 67
+34%
50−55
−34%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+1.9%
50−55
−1.9%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+1.6%
60−65
−1.6%
Hitman 3 20
−135%
45−50
+135%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90
+40.6%
60−65
−40.6%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+1.7%
55−60
−1.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+1.9%
50−55
−1.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 56
−1.8%
55−60
+1.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+69%
40−45
−69%
Watch Dogs: Legion 47
+30.6%
35−40
−30.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
−61.9%
30−35
+61.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+1.6%
60−65
−1.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 63
+5%
60−65
−5%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
−13.5%
40−45
+13.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 19
−89.5%
35−40
+89.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+10%
50−55
−10%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Hitman 3 26
−7.7%
27−30
+7.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18
+0%
18−20
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Far Cry 5 41
+24.2%
30−35
−24.2%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+2.6%
35−40
−2.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 47
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 52
+4%
50−55
−4%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Hitman 3 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%

This is how T1200 Mobile and RX 6500 compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 2% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 17% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 6% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 70% faster.
  • in Hitman 3, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6500 is 135% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is ahead in 31 test (57%)
  • RX 6500 is ahead in 8 tests (15%)
  • there's a draw in 15 tests (28%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.94 19.65

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between T1200 Mobile and Radeon RX 6500.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T1200 Mobile
T1200 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 6500
Radeon RX 6500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 35 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.