Radeon RX 6500 vs Quadro T2000 Mobile

Place in the ranking	270	276
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	23.89	no data
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	no data
GPU code name	TU117	no data
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	no data
Core clock speed	1575 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	4,700 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	114.2	no data
Floating-point processing power	3.656 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	no data
TMUs	64	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	no data
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T2000 Mobile 20.78
+2.2%

RX 6500 20.34

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T2000 Mobile 7985
+2.1%

RX 6500 7817

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +5.7%	35−40 −5.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +5%	40−45 −5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +3.1%	60−65 −3.1%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +5.7%	35−40 −5.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +5%	40−45 −5%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +3.5%	85−90 −3.5%
Forza Horizon 5	55−60 +1.9%	50−55 −1.9%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +12%	50−55 −12%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +2.2%	45−50 −2.2%
Valorant	80−85 +2.4%	80−85 −2.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +3.1%	60−65 −3.1%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +5.7%	35−40 −5.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +5%	40−45 −5%
Dota 2	70−75 +2.8%	70−75 −2.8%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +3%	65−70 −3%
Fortnite	100−110 +1.9%	100−110 −1.9%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +3.5%	85−90 −3.5%
Forza Horizon 5	55−60 +1.9%	50−55 −1.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	70−75 +2.8%	70−75 −2.8%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +3.7%	50−55 −3.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 +2.2%	130−140 −2.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +2.2%	45−50 −2.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 +3.1%	60−65 −3.1%
Valorant	80−85 +2.4%	80−85 −2.4%
World of Tanks	230−240 +1.3%	230−240 −1.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +3.1%	60−65 −3.1%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +5.7%	35−40 −5.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +5%	40−45 −5%
Dota 2	70−75 +2.8%	70−75 −2.8%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +3%	65−70 −3%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +3.5%	85−90 −3.5%
Forza Horizon 5	55−60 +10%	50−55 −10%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 +2.2%	130−140 −2.2%
Valorant	80−85 +5%	80−85 −5%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	30−35 +10%	30−33 −10%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +3%	30−35 −3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +7.5%	160−170 −7.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
World of Tanks	140−150 +7.7%	130−140 −7.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +2.4%	40−45 −2.4%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +3.3%	30−33 −3.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +3.6%	55−60 −3.6%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +3.8%	50−55 −3.8%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 +10%	30−33 −10%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +4.4%	45−50 −4.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +7.4%	27−30 −7.4%
Valorant	50−55 +8%	50−55 −8%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Dota 2	35−40 +16.7%	30−33 −16.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	35−40 +2.9%	30−35 −2.9%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 +3.3%	60−65 −3.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +2.9%	30−35 −2.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +5%	20−22 −5%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Dota 2	35−40 +2.9%	30−35 −2.9%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +3.8%	24−27 −3.8%
Fortnite	24−27 +4.2%	24−27 −4.2%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +3.3%	30−33 −3.3%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Valorant	24−27 +4.2%	24−27 −4.2%