T550 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6500
Aggregated performance score
Radeon RX 6500 outperforms T550 Mobile by an impressive 97% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 258 | 407 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | no data | Turing (2018−2021) |
| GPU code name | no data | TU117 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | no data | 27 May 2022 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 1065 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1665 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | no data | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 25 Watt (20 - 60 Watt TGP) |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 106.6 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon RX 6500 and T550 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR5, GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 12000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | no data | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | no data | 1.3 |
| CUDA | no data | 7.5 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 100−110
+92.3%
| 52
−92.3%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+100%
|
16−18
−100%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 40−45
+95.2%
|
21−24
−95.2%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 35−40
+119%
|
16−18
−119%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+94.3%
|
35−40
−94.3%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 50−55
+96.3%
|
27−30
−96.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+100%
|
16−18
−100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55
+29.3%
|
41
−29.3%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 55−60
+104%
|
27−30
−104%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+91.7%
|
35−40
−91.7%
|
| Hitman 3 | 55−60
+127%
|
24−27
−127%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 40−45
+105%
|
21−24
−105%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−35
+83.3%
|
18−20
−83.3%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 40−45
+95.5%
|
21−24
−95.5%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
+117%
|
18−20
−117%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 40−45
+95.2%
|
21−24
−95.2%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 35−40
+119%
|
16−18
−119%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+94.3%
|
35−40
−94.3%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 50−55
+96.3%
|
27−30
−96.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+100%
|
16−18
−100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55
+39.5%
|
38
−39.5%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 55−60
+104%
|
27−30
−104%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+91.7%
|
35−40
−91.7%
|
| Hitman 3 | 55−60
+127%
|
24−27
−127%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 40−45
+105%
|
21−24
−105%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−35
+120%
|
14−16
−120%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−35
+83.3%
|
18−20
−83.3%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 40−45
+95.5%
|
21−24
−95.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
+10%
|
40
−10%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
+117%
|
18−20
−117%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 40−45
+95.2%
|
21−24
−95.2%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 35−40
+119%
|
16−18
−119%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+94.3%
|
35−40
−94.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+100%
|
16−18
−100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55
+51.4%
|
35
−51.4%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 55−60
+104%
|
27−30
−104%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+91.7%
|
35−40
−91.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
+120%
|
20
−120%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
+117%
|
18−20
−117%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 30−33
+100%
|
14−16
−100%
|
| Hitman 3 | 30−35
+106%
|
16−18
−106%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 27−30
+68.8%
|
16−18
−68.8%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
+138%
|
8−9
−138%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
+114%
|
7−8
−114%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 24−27
+100%
|
12−14
−100%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+120%
|
10−11
−120%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 18−20
+217%
|
6−7
−217%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+150%
|
18−20
−150%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+140%
|
5−6
−140%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+113%
|
16−18
−113%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 35−40
+129%
|
16−18
−129%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+128%
|
18−20
−128%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 14−16
+180%
|
5−6
−180%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 14−16
+114%
|
7−8
−114%
|
| Hitman 3 | 18−20
+111%
|
9−10
−111%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
+62.5%
|
8−9
−62.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12−14
+200%
|
4−5
−200%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−12
+83.3%
|
6−7
−83.3%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 12−14
+160%
|
5−6
−160%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+163%
|
8−9
−163%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 12−14
+100%
|
6−7
−100%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 10−11
+150%
|
4−5
−150%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+188%
|
8−9
−188%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 16−18
+100%
|
8−9
−100%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 18−20
+72.7%
|
10−12
−72.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+115%
|
12−14
−115%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 9−10
+200%
|
3−4
−200%
|
This is how RX 6500 and T550 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RX 6500 is 92% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6500 is 300% faster than the T550 Mobile.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, RX 6500 surpassed T550 Mobile in all 67 of our tests.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
