NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

RX Vega M GL / 870
14.30

Quadro T2000 Mobile outperforms Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 by 44% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking336246
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data4.67
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameVega Kaby Lake-GN19P-Q3
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date7 January 2018 (6 years old)27 May 2019 (4 years old)
Current priceno data$2221
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801024
Core clock speed931 MHz1575 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rateno data114.2

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 and Quadro T2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data8000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkanno data1.2.131
CUDAno data7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega M GL / 870 14.30
T2000 Mobile 20.60
+44.1%

Quadro T2000 Mobile outperforms Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 by 44% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX Vega M GL / 870 9862
T2000 Mobile 13524
+37.1%

Quadro T2000 Mobile outperforms Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 by 37% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44
−36.4%
60−65
+36.4%
1440p23
−30.4%
30−35
+30.4%
4K14
−28.6%
18−21
+28.6%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−50%
30−35
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 47
+11.9%
40−45
−11.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−50%
35−40
+50%
Battlefield 5 62
−11.3%
65−70
+11.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 44
−22.7%
50−55
+22.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−50%
30−35
+50%
Far Cry 5 42
−28.6%
50−55
+28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 44
−25%
55−60
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−40%
70−75
+40%
Hitman 3 35−40
−53.8%
60−65
+53.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−46.7%
40−45
+46.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35
+2.9%
30−35
−2.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 41
−7.3%
40−45
+7.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 39
−7.7%
40−45
+7.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−50%
35−40
+50%
Battlefield 5 52
−32.7%
65−70
+32.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 36
−50%
50−55
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−50%
30−35
+50%
Far Cry 5 39
−38.5%
50−55
+38.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
−34.1%
55−60
+34.1%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−40%
70−75
+40%
Hitman 3 35−40
−53.8%
60−65
+53.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−46.7%
40−45
+46.7%
Metro Exodus 24
−37.5%
30−35
+37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16
−113%
30−35
+113%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41
−9.8%
45−50
+9.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 23
−82.6%
40−45
+82.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−50%
35−40
+50%
Battlefield 5 48
−43.8%
65−70
+43.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−50%
30−35
+50%
Far Cry 5 36
−50%
50−55
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−40%
70−75
+40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21
−47.6%
30−35
+47.6%
Hitman 3 21−24
−50%
30−35
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−35%
27−30
+35%
Metro Exodus 14
−42.9%
20−22
+42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−50%
14−16
+50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 19
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 17
−29.4%
21−24
+29.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−72.7%
18−20
+72.7%
Battlefield 5 34
−35.3%
45−50
+35.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Far Cry 5 24
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 27
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−55.6%
40−45
+55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−64.3%
21−24
+64.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12
−25%
14−16
+25%
Hitman 3 12−14
−46.2%
18−20
+46.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−50%
21−24
+50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 11
−18.2%
12−14
+18.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Battlefield 5 16
−50%
24−27
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Far Cry 5 12
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 13
−53.8%
20−22
+53.8%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−52.6%
27−30
+52.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%

This is how RX Vega M GL / 870 and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • T2000 Mobile is 36.4% faster than RX Vega M GL / 870

1440p resolution:

  • T2000 Mobile is 30.4% faster than RX Vega M GL / 870

4K resolution:

  • T2000 Mobile is 28.6% faster than RX Vega M GL / 870

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX Vega M GL / 870 is 11.9% faster than the T2000 Mobile.
  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 113% faster than the RX Vega M GL / 870.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GL / 870 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • T2000 Mobile is ahead in 66 tests (97%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 14.30 20.60
Recency 7 January 2018 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 60 Watt

The Quadro T2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro T2000 Mobile

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 117 votes

Rate AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 252 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.