GeForce MX570 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Aggregated performance score
We've compared laptop GPUs Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 and GeForce MX570, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GeForce MX570 outperforms Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 339 | 330 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | Vega (2017−2021) | Ampere (2020−2022) |
GPU code name | Vega Kaby Lake-G | GN20-S5 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 7 January 2018 (6 years ago) | 17 December 2021 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1280 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 931 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1011 MHz | 1477 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 8 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15-45 Watt |
Texture fill rate | no data | 73.92 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 and GeForce MX570 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | no data | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | no data | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 96 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Optimus | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12_1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | no data | 6.6 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
Vulkan | no data | 1.2 |
CUDA | no data | 8.6 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 44
−2.3%
| 45−50
+2.3%
|
1440p | 23
+9.5%
| 21−24
−9.5%
|
4K | 14
+0%
| 14−16
+0%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
−4.5%
|
21−24
+4.5%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 47
+51.6%
|
30−35
−51.6%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 24−27
−4.2%
|
24−27
+4.2%
|
Battlefield 5 | 62
+21.6%
|
50−55
−21.6%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 44
+15.8%
|
35−40
−15.8%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
−4.5%
|
21−24
+4.5%
|
Far Cry 5 | 42
+7.7%
|
35−40
−7.7%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 44
+7.3%
|
40−45
−7.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
−2%
|
50−55
+2%
|
Hitman 3 | 35−40
−5.1%
|
40−45
+5.1%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−33
−3.3%
|
30−35
+3.3%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 35
+40%
|
24−27
−40%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 41
+32.3%
|
30−35
−32.3%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 27−30
−3.7%
|
27−30
+3.7%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 39
+25.8%
|
30−35
−25.8%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 24−27
−4.2%
|
24−27
+4.2%
|
Battlefield 5 | 52
+2%
|
50−55
−2%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 36
−5.6%
|
35−40
+5.6%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
−4.5%
|
21−24
+4.5%
|
Far Cry 5 | 39
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 41
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
−2%
|
50−55
+2%
|
Hitman 3 | 35−40
−5.1%
|
40−45
+5.1%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−33
−3.3%
|
30−35
+3.3%
|
Metro Exodus | 24
+4.3%
|
21−24
−4.3%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 16
−56.3%
|
24−27
+56.3%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 33
+6.5%
|
30−35
−6.5%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 41
+32.3%
|
30−35
−32.3%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 27−30
−3.7%
|
27−30
+3.7%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 23
−34.8%
|
30−35
+34.8%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 24−27
−4.2%
|
24−27
+4.2%
|
Battlefield 5 | 48
−6.3%
|
50−55
+6.3%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
−4.5%
|
21−24
+4.5%
|
Far Cry 5 | 36
−8.3%
|
35−40
+8.3%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 38
−7.9%
|
40−45
+7.9%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
−2%
|
50−55
+2%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24
−29.2%
|
30−35
+29.2%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 27−30
−3.7%
|
27−30
+3.7%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 21
−4.8%
|
21−24
+4.8%
|
Hitman 3 | 21−24
−4.5%
|
21−24
+4.5%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 20−22
−5%
|
21−24
+5%
|
Metro Exodus | 14
+7.7%
|
12−14
−7.7%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−11
−10%
|
10−12
+10%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 19
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 17
+13.3%
|
14−16
−13.3%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12−14
+9.1%
|
Battlefield 5 | 34
+9.7%
|
30−35
−9.7%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
−14.3%
|
8−9
+14.3%
|
Far Cry 5 | 24
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 27
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−3.6%
|
27−30
+3.6%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
−7.1%
|
14−16
+7.1%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12
+20%
|
10−11
−20%
|
Hitman 3 | 12−14
−7.7%
|
14−16
+7.7%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 11
+22.2%
|
9−10
−22.2%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 16
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 12
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 13
−15.4%
|
14−16
+15.4%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
This is how RX Vega M GL / 870 and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:
- GeForce MX570 is 2.3% faster than RX Vega M GL / 870 in 1080p
- RX Vega M GL / 870 is 9.5% faster than GeForce MX570 in 1440p
- GeForce MX570 is 0% faster than RX Vega M GL / 870 in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX Vega M GL / 870 is 51.6% faster than the GeForce MX570.
- in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 56.3% faster than the RX Vega M GL / 870.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX Vega M GL / 870 is ahead in 17 tests (25%)
- GeForce MX570 is ahead in 35 tests (51%)
- there's a draw in 16 tests (24%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 14.33 | 14.89 |
Recency | 7 January 2018 | 17 December 2021 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 8 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 and GeForce MX570.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.