GeForce MX570 vs Radeon RX Vega 9

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 9 and GeForce MX570, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 9
2017
15 Watt
4.80

MX570 outperforms RX Vega 9 by a whopping 166% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking618364
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.4840.67
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeGA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date26 October 2017 (7 years ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5762048
Core clock speedno data832 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz1155 MHz
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rateno data73.92
Floating-point processing powerno data4.731 TFLOPS
ROPsno data40
TMUsno data64
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−117%
39
+117%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−430%
122
+430%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−164%
27−30
+164%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−173%
60−65
+173%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−361%
106
+361%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−164%
27−30
+164%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−213%
45−50
+213%
Fortnite 22
−259%
75−80
+259%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−142%
55−60
+142%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−214%
40−45
+214%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−155%
50−55
+155%
Valorant 60−65
−84.1%
110−120
+84.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−173%
60−65
+173%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−73.9%
40
+73.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
−112%
180−190
+112%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−164%
27−30
+164%
Dota 2 40−45
−102%
85−90
+102%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−213%
45−50
+213%
Fortnite 16
−394%
75−80
+394%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−142%
55−60
+142%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−214%
40−45
+214%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−200%
54
+200%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−190%
27−30
+190%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−155%
50−55
+155%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−192%
35−40
+192%
Valorant 60−65
−84.1%
110−120
+84.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−173%
60−65
+173%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−164%
27−30
+164%
Dota 2 40−45
−102%
85−90
+102%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−213%
45−50
+213%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−142%
55−60
+142%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−155%
50−55
+155%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
−325%
34
+325%
Valorant 60−65
−84.1%
110−120
+84.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9
−778%
75−80
+778%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
−160%
100−110
+160%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−267%
21−24
+267%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−325%
16−18
+325%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−269%
120−130
+269%
Valorant 55−60
−150%
140−150
+150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−533%
35−40
+533%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−183%
30−35
+183%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−175%
21−24
+175%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
−210%
30−35
+210%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−52.9%
24−27
+52.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1800%
18−20
+1800%
Valorant 24−27
−192%
75−80
+192%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Dota 2 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−200%
14−16
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how RX Vega 9 and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX570 is 117% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 1800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX570 is ahead in 60 tests (95%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.80 12.77
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

RX Vega 9 has 66.7% lower power consumption.

GeForce MX570, on the other hand, has a 166% higher aggregate performance score, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce MX570 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 9 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
Radeon RX Vega 9
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 23 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 9 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 95 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 9 or GeForce MX570, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.