Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) vs GeForce MX570
Aggregated performance score
GeForce MX570 outperforms Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by 64% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary Details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 328 | 443 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 30 |
| Architecture | Ampere (2020−2022) | Vega (2017−2021) |
| GPU code name | GN20-S5 | Vega |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 17 December 2021 (2 years ago) | 7 January 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed Specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 512 |
| Boost clock speed | 1477 MHz | 2100 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15-45 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 73.92 | no data |
Form Factor & Compatibility
Information on GeForce MX570 and Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and Outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
Supported Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | no data |
API Compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | no data |
| CUDA | 8.6 | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 35−40
+59.1%
| 22
−59.1%
|
| 1440p | 24−27
+50%
| 16
−50%
|
| 4K | 16−18
+60%
| 10
−60%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
+26.3%
|
19
−26.3%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 30−35
+68.4%
|
18−20
−68.4%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 24−27
+30%
|
20
−30%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55
+35.9%
|
39
−35.9%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 40−45
+60%
|
24−27
−60%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
+71.4%
|
14
−71.4%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+81.8%
|
22
−81.8%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 40−45
+55.6%
|
27
−55.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+68.8%
|
30−35
−68.8%
|
| Hitman 3 | 40−45
+72%
|
25
−72%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−35
+65%
|
20
−65%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27
+18.2%
|
22
−18.2%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 30−35
+39.1%
|
23
−39.1%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 27−30
+38.1%
|
21
−38.1%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 30−35
+68.4%
|
18−20
−68.4%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 24−27
+62.5%
|
16
−62.5%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55
+60.6%
|
33
−60.6%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 40−45
+60%
|
24−27
−60%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
+140%
|
10
−140%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+100%
|
20
−100%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 40−45
+68%
|
25
−68%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+68.8%
|
30−35
−68.8%
|
| Hitman 3 | 40−45
+105%
|
21
−105%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−35
+106%
|
16
−106%
|
| Metro Exodus | 24−27
+50%
|
16
−50%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27
+117%
|
12
−117%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 30−35
+60%
|
20
−60%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
+52.4%
|
21
−52.4%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 27−30
+70.6%
|
17
−70.6%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 30−35
+68.4%
|
18−20
−68.4%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 24−27
+85.7%
|
14
−85.7%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55
+76.7%
|
30
−76.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
+167%
|
9
−167%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+111%
|
19
−111%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 40−45
+75%
|
24
−75%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+68.8%
|
30−35
−68.8%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
+129%
|
14
−129%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 27−30
+142%
|
12
−142%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 21−24
+76.9%
|
12−14
−76.9%
|
| Hitman 3 | 24−27
+60%
|
15
−60%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24
+75%
|
12
−75%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
+40%
|
10
−40%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−12
+83.3%
|
6−7
−83.3%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 20−22
+66.7%
|
12
−66.7%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 16−18
+100%
|
8−9
−100%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 12−14
+18.2%
|
11
−18.2%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 30−35
+57.1%
|
21
−57.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+60%
|
5
−60%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27
+56.3%
|
16
−56.3%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+70.6%
|
17
−70.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−33
+87.5%
|
16−18
−87.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+100%
|
8−9
−100%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 10−11
+25%
|
8
−25%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−12
+83.3%
|
6−7
−83.3%
|
| Hitman 3 | 14−16
+75%
|
8−9
−75%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−11
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
| Metro Exodus | 8−9
+33.3%
|
6
−33.3%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10
+50%
|
6
−50%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+150%
|
6−7
−150%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 9−10
+80%
|
5−6
−80%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 7−8
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+50%
|
8
−50%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 14−16
+87.5%
|
8
−87.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+90.9%
|
10−12
−90.9%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 6−7
+200%
|
2−3
−200%
|
This is how GeForce MX570 and RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) compete in popular games:
- GeForce MX570 is 59.1% faster than RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in 1080p
- GeForce MX570 is 50% faster than RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in 1440p
- GeForce MX570 is 60% faster than RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 200% faster than the RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000).
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, GeForce MX570 surpassed RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in all 68 of our tests.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Performance score | 14.89 | 9.06 |
| Recency | 17 December 2021 | 7 January 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 8 nm | 7 nm |
The GeForce MX570 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with Similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
