Pro Vega 56 vs RX Vega 56

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

RX Vega 56
34.33
+7.7%

RX Vega 56 outperforms Pro Vega 56 by 8% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking142162
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money27.032.90
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)Vega (2017−2021)
GPU code nameVegaVega
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date14 August 2017 (6 years old)14 December 2017 (6 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $399
Current price$224 (0.6x MSRP)$4999 (12.5x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX Vega 56 has 832% better value for money than Pro Vega 56.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35843584
Core clock speed1138 MHz1247 MHz
Boost clock speed1474 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt210 Watt
Texture fill rate329.5280.0
Floating-point performance10,566 gflops9,677 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width409.6 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz786 MHz
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/s402.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.1.125

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 56 34.33
+7.7%
Pro Vega 56 31.87

RX Vega 56 outperforms Pro Vega 56 by 8% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX Vega 56 13307
+7.7%
Pro Vega 56 12353

RX Vega 56 outperforms Pro Vega 56 by 8% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX Vega 56 29086
+13.7%
Pro Vega 56 25589

RX Vega 56 outperforms Pro Vega 56 by 14% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX Vega 56 20759
+16.6%
Pro Vega 56 17797

RX Vega 56 outperforms Pro Vega 56 by 17% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD116
+17.2%
99
−17.2%
1440p77
+10%
70−75
−10%
4K48
−18.8%
57
+18.8%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+9.3%
50−55
−9.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 77
+28.3%
60−65
−28.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+7.1%
55−60
−7.1%
Battlefield 5 151
+54.1%
95−100
−54.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
+8.1%
85−90
−8.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+9.3%
50−55
−9.3%
Far Cry 5 98
+18.1%
80−85
−18.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 96
+20%
80−85
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 141
+38.2%
100−110
−38.2%
Hitman 3 100−110
+9.1%
95−100
−9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+7.2%
65−70
−7.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+7.8%
50−55
−7.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 105
+41.9%
70−75
−41.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+8.3%
60−65
−8.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70
+16.7%
60−65
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+7.1%
55−60
−7.1%
Battlefield 5 140
+42.9%
95−100
−42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
+8.1%
85−90
−8.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+9.3%
50−55
−9.3%
Far Cry 5 93
+12%
80−85
−12%
Far Cry New Dawn 93
+16.3%
80−85
−16.3%
Forza Horizon 4 134
+31.4%
100−110
−31.4%
Hitman 3 100−110
+9.1%
95−100
−9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+7.2%
65−70
−7.2%
Metro Exodus 70
+27.3%
55−60
−27.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+7.8%
50−55
−7.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 91
+23%
70−75
−23%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 124
+6.9%
116
−6.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+8.3%
60−65
−8.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 52
−15.4%
60−65
+15.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+7.1%
55−60
−7.1%
Battlefield 5 131
+33.7%
95−100
−33.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+9.3%
50−55
−9.3%
Far Cry 5 89
+7.2%
80−85
−7.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 84
+5%
80−85
−5%
Forza Horizon 4 109
+6.9%
100−110
−6.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+15.6%
64
−15.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+8.3%
60−65
−8.3%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+9.8%
50−55
−9.8%
Hitman 3 60−65
+10.7%
55−60
−10.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+9.3%
40−45
−9.3%
Metro Exodus 42
+23.5%
30−35
−23.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+8%
24−27
−8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 58
+28.9%
45−50
−28.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 44
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+8.8%
30−35
−8.8%
Battlefield 5 99
+43.5%
65−70
−43.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+13%
21−24
−13%
Far Cry 5 74
+29.8%
55−60
−29.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 74
+21.3%
60−65
−21.3%
Forza Horizon 4 88
+33.3%
65−70
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+11.9%
40−45
−11.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Hitman 3 30−35
+9.7%
30−35
−9.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+13.6%
21−24
−13.6%
Metro Exodus 27
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 31
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+4.8%
42
−4.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+10.5%
18−20
−10.5%
Battlefield 5 55
+41%
35−40
−41%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Far Cry 5 39
+34.5%
27−30
−34.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 42
+31.3%
30−35
−31.3%
Forza Horizon 4 59
+31.1%
45−50
−31.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%

This is how RX Vega 56 and Pro Vega 56 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RX Vega 56 is 17.2% faster than Pro Vega 56

1440p resolution:

  • RX Vega 56 is 10% faster than Pro Vega 56

4K resolution:

  • Pro Vega 56 is 18.8% faster than RX Vega 56

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX Vega 56 is 54.1% faster than the Pro Vega 56.
  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro Vega 56 is 15.4% faster than the RX Vega 56.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega 56 is ahead in 67 tests (99%)
  • Pro Vega 56 is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 34.33 31.87
Recency 14 August 2017 14 December 2017

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 56 and Radeon Pro Vega 56. The differences in performance seem too small.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 56 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro Vega 56 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Radeon RX Vega 56
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Radeon Pro Vega 56

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 658 votes

Rate AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 88 votes

Rate AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.