Radeon Pro Vega 56: specs and benchmarks
Aggregated performance score
It provides good gaming and benchmark performance at 31.90% of a leader's which is GeForce RTX 4090.
Summary
AMD started Radeon Pro Vega 56 sales 14 December 2017 at a recommended price of $399 . This is a Vega architecture desktop card based on 14 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 8 GB of HBM2 memory clocked at 786 GHz are supplied, and together with 2048 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 402.4 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is an integrated video card. Its manufacturer default version has a length of 267 mm. No additional power connector is required, and power consumption is at 210 Watt.
General info
Some basic facts about Radeon Pro Vega 56: architecture, market segment, release date etc.
| Place in performance ranking | 163 | |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | |
| Value for money | 2.95 | |
| Architecture | Vega (2017−2021) | |
| GPU code name | Vega | |
| Market segment | Workstation | |
| Release date | 14 December 2017 (6 years ago) | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Current price | $4999 (12.5x MSRP) | of 168889 (A100 PCIe 80 GB) |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Technical specs
Radeon Pro Vega 56's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon Pro Vega 56's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3584 | of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT) |
| Core clock speed | 1247 MHz | of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) |
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | of 3599 (Radeon RX 7990 XTX) |
| Number of transistors | 12,500 million | of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | of 4 (Radeon 780M) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 210 Watt | of 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem) |
| Texture fill rate | 280.0 | of 969.9 (H100 SXM5 96 GB) |
| Floating-point performance | 9,677 gflops | of 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo) |
Size and compatibility
This section provides details about the physical dimensions of Radeon Pro Vega 56 and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Width | IGP | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed on Radeon Pro Vega 56: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.
| Memory type | HBM2 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | of 192 (Radeon Instinct MI300X) |
| Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory clock speed | 786 MHz | of 23000 (GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER) |
| Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB/s | of 3276 (Aldebaran) |
| Shared memory | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon Pro Vega 56. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
| HDMI | + |
API support
APIs supported by Radeon Pro Vega 56, sometimes including their particular versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.125 |
Benchmark performance
Synthetic benchmark performance of Radeon Pro Vega 56. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 9%
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
Send your test results of Radeon Pro Vega 56.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good Radeon Pro Vega 56 is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 99 | |
| 4K | 57 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 60−65 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 55−60 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 95−100 | |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 85−90 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 80−85 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 80−85 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 100−110 | |
| Hitman 3 | 95−100 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 65−70 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 50−55 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 70−75 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 60−65 |
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 60−65 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 55−60 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 95−100 | |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 85−90 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 80−85 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 80−85 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 100−110 | |
| Hitman 3 | 95−100 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 65−70 | |
| Metro Exodus | 55−60 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 50−55 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 70−75 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 116 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 60−65 |
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 60−65 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 55−60 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 95−100 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 80−85 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 80−85 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 100−110 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 64 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 60−65 |
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 50−55 | |
| Hitman 3 | 55−60 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 40−45 | |
| Metro Exodus | 30−35 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 45−50 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30−35 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 60−65 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 27−30 |
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30 | |
| Hitman 3 | 30−35 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24 | |
| Metro Exodus | 21−24 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 16−18 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 24−27 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 42 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 18−20 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 30−35 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 16−18 |
NVIDIA equivalent
According to our data, the closest NVIDIA alternative to Radeon Pro Vega 56 is Quadro P5000, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 3 positions in our ranking.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon Pro Vega 56:
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with Radeon Pro Vega 56 according to our statistics.
