GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile vs Radeon RX 6600S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

RX 6600S
2022
4 GB GDDR6
35.34
+42.3%

Radeon RX 6600S outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile by a considerable 42% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking133200
Place by popularitynot in top-10065
ArchitectureRDNA 2 (2020−2022)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 23GN20-P0
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922048
Core clock speedno data1238 MHz
Boost clock speed1881 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate224.0no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 6600S and GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed16000 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.2no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90−95
+40.6%
64
−40.6%
1440p60−65
+36.4%
44
−36.4%
4K35−40
+34.6%
26
−34.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−8.2%
66
+8.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+30.6%
45−50
−30.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+6.9%
58
−6.9%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+14%
93
−14%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100
+47.7%
65−70
−47.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+17.3%
52
−17.3%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+32.4%
68
−32.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+4.8%
83
−4.8%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+32.5%
80−85
−32.5%
Hitman 3 110−120
+8.8%
102
−8.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+1.3%
75
−1.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+42.5%
40−45
−42.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+16.9%
71
−16.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+0%
66
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+30.6%
45−50
−30.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+93.8%
32
−93.8%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+19.1%
89
−19.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100
+47.7%
65−70
−47.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+48.8%
41
−48.8%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+40.6%
64
−40.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+13%
77
−13%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+32.5%
80−85
−32.5%
Hitman 3 110−120
+56.3%
71
−56.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+28.8%
59
−28.8%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+26.5%
49
−26.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+42.5%
40−45
−42.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+36.1%
61
−36.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+7.4%
81
−7.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+15.8%
57
−15.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+30.6%
45−50
−30.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+158%
24
−158%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+27.7%
83
−27.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+79.4%
34
−79.4%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+47.5%
61
−47.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+31.8%
66
−31.8%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+32.5%
80−85
−32.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+89.1%
46
−89.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+154%
26
−154%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+52.6%
35−40
−52.6%
Hitman 3 60−65
+45.5%
44
−45.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+6.5%
46
−6.5%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+31%
29
−31%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+47.4%
18−20
−47.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+21.4%
42
−21.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+40.7%
27−30
−40.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+72.7%
22
−72.7%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+15.2%
66
−15.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+50%
18
−50%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+30.6%
49
−30.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+28.8%
52
−28.8%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+45.1%
50−55
−45.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+63.3%
30−33
−63.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+63.2%
19
−63.2%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+63.2%
18−20
−63.2%
Hitman 3 35−40
+66.7%
21
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+62.5%
16−18
−62.5%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+41.2%
17
−41.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+46.2%
12−14
−46.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+17.4%
23
−17.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+41.4%
29
−41.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+61.5%
12−14
−61.5%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+22.9%
35
−22.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+73.7%
19
−73.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+40%
35−40
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%

This is how RX 6600S and RTX 3050 4GB Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600S is 41% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600S is 36% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6600S is 35% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6600S is 158% faster than the RTX 3050 4GB Mobile.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 8% faster than the RX 6600S.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6600S is ahead in 66 tests (97%)
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.34 24.84
Recency 4 January 2022 11 May 2021
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 60 Watt

The Radeon RX 6600S is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6600S
Radeon RX 6600S
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 10 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 905 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.