Radeon 740M vs HD Graphics 2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 2000 with Radeon 740M, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 2000
2011
0.53

740M outperforms HD Graphics 2000 by a whopping 1389% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1263551
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.67
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT1Phoenix2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2011 (14 years ago)31 January 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48256
Core clock speed850 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz2800 MHz
Number of transistors189 million20,900 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown45 Watt
Texture fill rate8.10044.80
Floating-point processing power0.1296 TFLOPS2.867 TFLOPS
ROPs18
TMUs616
Ray Tracing Coresno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 2000 0.53
Radeon 740M 7.89
+1389%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 2000 213
Radeon 740M 3182
+1394%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD Graphics 2000 896
Radeon 740M 24621
+2649%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11
−90.9%
21
+90.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Dead Island 2 0−1 27−30

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Dead Island 2 0−1 27−30
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−750%
30−35
+750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−250%
27−30
+250%
Valorant 27−30
−186%
80−85
+186%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−624%
120−130
+624%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Dead Island 2 0−1 27−30
Dota 2 10−12
−1355%
160−170
+1355%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−750%
30−35
+750%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−250%
27−30
+250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−300%
20−22
+300%
Valorant 27−30
−186%
80−85
+186%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Dead Island 2 0−1 27−30
Dota 2 10−12
−1355%
160−170
+1355%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−750%
30−35
+750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−250%
27−30
+250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−300%
20−22
+300%
Valorant 27−30
−186%
80−85
+186%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−1300%
40−45
+1300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 6−7
Dead Island 2 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%

4K
High Preset

Dead Island 2 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−18.8%
18−20
+18.8%
Valorant 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dead Island 2 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 73
+0%
73
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60
+0%
60
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 26
+0%
26
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27
+0%
27
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 2000 and Radeon 740M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 740M is 91% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 740M is 5900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 740M is ahead in 29 tests (52%)
  • there's a draw in 27 tests (48%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 7.89
Recency 1 February 2011 31 January 2024
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm

Radeon 740M has a 1388.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 740M is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 2000 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 740M is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 2000
HD Graphics 2000
AMD Radeon 740M
Radeon 740M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1404 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 137 votes

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 2000 or Radeon 740M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.