Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon Pro W6600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W6600M and RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro W6600M
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 90 Watt
26.08
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
26.26
+0.7%

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Pro W6600M by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking220218
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.4953.06
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 23AD107
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date8 June 2021 (3 years ago)26 February 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922048
Core clock speed1224 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed2034 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate227.8129.6
Floating-point processing power7.29 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs11264
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Cores2816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 140−150
+4.3%
140−150
−4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 50−55
+6%
50−55
−6%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+4.2%
95−100
−4.2%
Counter-Strike 2 140−150
+4.3%
140−150
−4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+5%
80−85
−5%
Fortnite 120−130
+2.5%
120−130
−2.5%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+1%
100−105
−1%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+1.3%
80−85
−1.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 50−55
+6%
50−55
−6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0.6%
170−180
−0.6%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+4.2%
95−100
−4.2%
Counter-Strike 2 140−150
+4.3%
140−150
−4.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+0.8%
260−270
−0.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Dota 2 120−130
+4.2%
120−130
−4.2%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+5%
80−85
−5%
Fortnite 120−130
+2.5%
120−130
−2.5%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+1%
100−105
−1%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+1.3%
80−85
−1.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 90−95
+2.2%
90−95
−2.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 50−55
+6%
50−55
−6%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+2.7%
75−80
−2.7%
Valorant 170−180
+0.6%
170−180
−0.6%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+4.2%
95−100
−4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Dota 2 120−130
+4.2%
120−130
−4.2%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+5%
80−85
−5%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+1%
100−105
−1%
Hogwarts Legacy 50−55
+6%
50−55
−6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+2.7%
75−80
−2.7%
Valorant 170−180
+0.6%
170−180
−0.6%
Fortnite 120−130
+2.5%
120−130
−2.5%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+3.6%
55−60
−3.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+4.7%
170−180
−4.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+2.9%
170−180
−2.9%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+5.5%
55−60
−5.5%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+1.5%
65−70
−1.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
Fortnite 60−65
+1.7%
60−65
−1.7%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Valorant 140−150
−0.7%
150−160
+0.7%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Dota 2 80−85
+2.5%
80−85
−2.5%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Fortnite 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.08 26.26
Recency 8 June 2021 26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 35 Watt

Pro W6600M has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 0.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 157.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro W6600M and RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4
4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2
24 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W6600M or RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.