Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon Pro W6600M

Place in the ranking	205	206
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	20.97	53.91
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 23	AD107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	8 June 2021 (3 years ago)	26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	2048
Core clock speed	1224 MHz	1485 MHz
Boost clock speed	2034 MHz	2025 MHz
Number of transistors	11,060 million	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	90 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	227.8	129.6
Floating-point processing power	7.29 TFLOPS	8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	32
TMUs	112	64
Tensor Cores	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	28	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	50−55 +4%	50−55 −4%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +1.8%	55−60 −1.8%
Elden Ring	90−95 +1.1%	90−95 −1.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +2.5%	80−85 −2.5%
Counter-Strike 2	50−55 +4%	50−55 −4%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +1.8%	55−60 −1.8%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +1.7%	120−130 −1.7%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +1.4%	70−75 −1.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +7.3%	55−60 −7.3%
Valorant	100−110 +9%	100−105 −9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +2.5%	80−85 −2.5%
Counter-Strike 2	50−55 +4%	50−55 −4%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +1.8%	55−60 −1.8%
Dota 2	90−95 +3.3%	90−95 −3.3%
Elden Ring	90−95 +1.1%	90−95 −1.1%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +1.3%	80−85 −1.3%
Fortnite	130−140 +3.1%	130−140 −3.1%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +1.7%	120−130 −1.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	90−95 +2.2%	90−95 −2.2%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +1.4%	70−75 −1.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 +3.8%	160−170 −3.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +7.3%	55−60 −7.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	90−95 +5.9%	85−90 −5.9%
Valorant	100−110 +9%	100−105 −9%
World of Tanks	260−270 +2.3%	260−270 −2.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +2.5%	80−85 −2.5%
Counter-Strike 2	50−55 +4%	50−55 −4%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +1.8%	55−60 −1.8%
Dota 2	90−95 +3.3%	90−95 −3.3%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +1.3%	80−85 −1.3%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +1.7%	120−130 −1.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 +3.8%	160−170 −3.8%
Valorant	100−110 +9%	100−105 −9%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	45−50 +4.4%	45−50 −4.4%
Elden Ring	50−55 +11.1%	45−50 −11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	45−50 +4.4%	45−50 −4.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +2.9%	170−180 −2.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +4.2%	24−27 −4.2%
World of Tanks	170−180 +5.3%	170−180 −5.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +10%	50−55 −10%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +6.7%	30−33 −6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +14.3%	21−24 −14.3%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +2.5%	80−85 −2.5%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +5.7%	70−75 −5.7%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +3.3%	60−65 −3.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +5%	40−45 −5%
Valorant	75−80 +1.3%	75−80 −1.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +4.2%	24−27 −4.2%
Dota 2	45−50 +6.7%	45−50 −6.7%
Elden Ring	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	45−50 +6.7%	45−50 −6.7%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +16.7%	18−20 −16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	80−85 +5%	80−85 −5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +6.7%	45−50 −6.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +7.4%	27−30 −7.4%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +4.2%	24−27 −4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Dota 2	45−50 +6.7%	45−50 −6.7%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +5.7%	35−40 −5.7%
Fortnite	35−40 +16.7%	30−33 −16.7%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +7.5%	40−45 −7.5%
Valorant	35−40 +5.7%	35−40 −5.7%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	27.38	27.37
Recency	8 June 2021	26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	90 Watt	35 Watt

Pro W6600M has a 0% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 157.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro W6600M and RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.