RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Radeon Pro W6600M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking239not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.30no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 23AD107
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date8 June 2021 (4 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17923072
Core clock speed1224 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speed2034 MHz2010 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate227.8193.0
Floating-point processing power7.29 TFLOPS12.35 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs11296
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Cores2824
L0 Cache448 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KB3 MB
L2 Cache2 MB12 MB
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 June 2021 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has an age advantage of 1 year, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W6600M and RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W6600M or RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.