Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro Vega 64

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon Pro Vega 16 Radeon Pro Vega 20 Radeon Pro Vega 48 Radeon Pro Vega 56 Radeon Pro Vega 64 Radeon Pro Vega 64X
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro Vega 64 with Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

Pro Vega 64
2017
16 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
31.11

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms Pro Vega 64 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Pro Vega 64 Pro Vega 64
RTX 5000 Max-Q RTX 5000 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking175169
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.1428.83
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVega 10TU104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date27 June 2017 (7 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40963072
Core clock speed1250 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate345.6259.2
Floating-point processing power11.06 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs256192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.1.1251.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro Vega 64 31.11
RTX 5000 Max-Q 31.43
+1%
  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro Vega 64 12917
RTX 5000 Max-Q 13047
+1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
−6%
106
+6%
1440p60−65
−8.3%
65
+8.3%
4K40−45
−7.5%
43
+7.5%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Battlefield 5 131
+0%
131
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 106
+0%
106
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Battlefield 5 120
+0%
120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 122
+0%
122
+0%
Far Cry 5 101
+0%
101
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 108
+0%
108
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Metro Exodus 73
+0%
73
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 145
+0%
145
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Battlefield 5 112
+0%
112
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 118
+0%
118
+0%
Far Cry 5 96
+0%
96
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 83
+0%
83
+0%
Valorant 141
+0%
141
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 36
+0%
36
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Battlefield 5 91
+0%
91
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 74
+0%
74
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 79
+0%
79
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 26
+0%
26
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+0%
50
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Battlefield 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 99
+0%
99
+0%
Far Cry 5 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how Pro Vega 64 and RTX 5000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Max-Q is 6% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 Max-Q is 8% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 Max-Q is 8% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 31.11 31.43
Recency 27 June 2017 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 80 Watt

RTX 5000 Max-Q has a 1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 212.5% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro Vega 64 and Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 64 is a workstation card while Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Radeon Pro Vega 64
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro Vega 64 Radeon Pro Vega 64
vs
RTX 4000 Mobile Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
RTX 5000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
vs
Pro Vega 64X Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Pro Vega 64 Radeon Pro Vega 64
vs
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Arc Graphics 130V Arc Graphics 130V
vs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
vs
HD Graphics 5500 HD Graphics 5500
Apple M4 40-core GPU M4 40 core GPU
vs
Qualcomm Adreno 830 Adreno 830
RX 7800M RX 7800M
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile
R9 290 R9 290
vs
RTX 5060 RTX 5060
Pro W6600M Pro W6600M
vs
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
vs
HD 7540D IGP HD 7540D IGP
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile 1080 SLI Mobile
vs
RTX 4080 Ti Mobile 4080 Ti Mobile
GTX 1080 Mobile GTX 1080 Mobile
vs
ATI HD 5770 HD 5770
GTX 1080 Mobile GTX 1080 Mobile
vs
Pro W6400 Pro W6400

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8
23 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6
50 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 64 or Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.