RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon Pro W6600M

Place in the ranking	210	116
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	20.90	23.57
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 23	no data
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	8 June 2021 (3 years ago)	21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	3072
Core clock speed	1224 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2034 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	11,060 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	90 Watt	115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	227.8	no data
Floating-point processing power	7.29 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	64	no data
TMUs	112	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	28	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate
Shader Model	6.7	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.1	no data
Vulkan	1.3	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W6600M 26.26

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 37.84
+44.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro W6600M 10525

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 15163
+44.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	50−55 −34.6%	70−75 +34.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 −42.9%	80−85 +42.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 −34.1%	110−120 +34.1%
Counter-Strike 2	50−55 −34.6%	70−75 +34.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 −42.9%	80−85 +42.9%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −39.3%	170−180 +39.3%
Forza Horizon 5	70−75 −38.9%	100−105 +38.9%
Metro Exodus	70−75 −40.8%	100−105 +40.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −44.1%	85−90 +44.1%
Valorant	100−110 −37.6%	150−160 +37.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 −34.1%	110−120 +34.1%
Counter-Strike 2	50−55 −34.6%	70−75 +34.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 −42.9%	80−85 +42.9%
Dota 2	90−95 −39.8%	130−140 +39.8%
Far Cry 5	80−85 −35.8%	110−120 +35.8%
Fortnite	130−140 −41.8%	190−200 +41.8%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −39.3%	170−180 +39.3%
Forza Horizon 5	70−75 −38.9%	100−105 +38.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	90−95 −39.8%	130−140 +39.8%
Metro Exodus	70−75 −40.8%	100−105 +40.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 −38.6%	230−240 +38.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −44.1%	85−90 +44.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	90−95 −33.3%	120−130 +33.3%
Valorant	100−110 −37.6%	150−160 +37.6%
World of Tanks	260−270 −31.6%	350−400 +31.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 −34.1%	110−120 +34.1%
Counter-Strike 2	50−55 −34.6%	70−75 +34.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 −42.9%	80−85 +42.9%
Dota 2	90−95 −39.8%	130−140 +39.8%
Far Cry 5	80−85 −35.8%	110−120 +35.8%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −39.3%	170−180 +39.3%
Forza Horizon 5	70−75 −38.9%	100−105 +38.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 −38.6%	230−240 +38.6%
Valorant	100−110 −37.6%	150−160 +37.6%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	45−50 −38.3%	65−70 +38.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	45−50 −38.3%	65−70 +38.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −42.9%	250−260 +42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −40%	35−40 +40%
World of Tanks	170−180 −39.7%	250−260 +39.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 −36.4%	75−80 +36.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −25%	30−33 +25%
Far Cry 5	80−85 −34.1%	110−120 +34.1%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −35.1%	100−105 +35.1%
Forza Horizon 5	40−45 −36.4%	60−65 +36.4%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −37.1%	85−90 +37.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −42.9%	60−65 +42.9%
Valorant	75−80 −31.6%	100−105 +31.6%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Dota 2	45−50 −42.9%	70−75 +42.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	45−50 −35.4%	65−70 +35.4%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −36.4%	30−33 +36.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	80−85 −42.9%	120−130 +42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −35.4%	65−70 +35.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −37.9%	40−45 +37.9%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Dota 2	45−50 −42.9%	70−75 +42.9%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −35.1%	50−55 +35.1%
Fortnite	35−40 −42.9%	50−55 +42.9%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −39.5%	60−65 +39.5%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 −25%	30−33 +25%
Valorant	35−40 −35.1%	50−55 +35.1%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	26.26	37.84
Recency	8 June 2021	21 March 2023
Chip lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	90 Watt	115 Watt

Pro W6600M has 27.8% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 44.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro W6600M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.