AMD Radeon Pro 5600M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

T2000 Mobile
20.60

Radeon Pro 5600M outperforms Quadro T2000 Mobile by 16% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking246210
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money4.67no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code nameN19P-Q3Navi 10
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date27 May 2019 (4 years old)15 June 2020 (3 years old)
Current price$2221 no data
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242560
Core clock speed1575 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1785 MHz1265 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate114.2164.8

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro T2000 Mobile and Radeon Pro 5600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz1540 MBps
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s394.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T2000 Mobile 20.60
Pro 5600M 23.95
+16.3%

Radeon Pro 5600M outperforms Quadro T2000 Mobile by 16% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

T2000 Mobile 7985
Pro 5600M 9282
+16.2%

Radeon Pro 5600M outperforms Quadro T2000 Mobile by 16% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−18.2%
35−40
+18.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−14.3%
45−50
+14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−16.7%
40−45
+16.7%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−13%
75−80
+13%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−16.7%
60−65
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−18.2%
35−40
+18.2%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−16.7%
60−65
+16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−14.5%
60−65
+14.5%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−14.3%
80−85
+14.3%
Hitman 3 60−65
−20%
70−75
+20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−15.9%
50−55
+15.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−14.7%
35−40
+14.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−20.5%
50−55
+20.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−15%
45−50
+15%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−14.3%
45−50
+14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−16.7%
40−45
+16.7%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−13%
75−80
+13%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−16.7%
60−65
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−18.2%
35−40
+18.2%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−16.7%
60−65
+16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−14.5%
60−65
+14.5%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−14.3%
80−85
+14.3%
Hitman 3 60−65
−20%
70−75
+20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−15.9%
50−55
+15.9%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−21.2%
40−45
+21.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−14.7%
35−40
+14.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−20.5%
50−55
+20.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−20%
50−55
+20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−15%
45−50
+15%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−14.3%
45−50
+14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−16.7%
40−45
+16.7%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−13%
75−80
+13%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−18.2%
35−40
+18.2%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−16.7%
60−65
+16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−14.5%
60−65
+14.5%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−14.3%
80−85
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−20%
50−55
+20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−15%
45−50
+15%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−19.4%
35−40
+19.4%
Hitman 3 30−35
−21.2%
40−45
+21.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−18.5%
30−35
+18.5%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−18.5%
30−35
+18.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−18.2%
24−27
+18.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−15.2%
50−55
+15.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−25%
14−16
+25%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−17.1%
40−45
+17.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−15%
45−50
+15%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−16.7%
45−50
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−21.7%
27−30
+21.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Hitman 3 18−20
−15.8%
21−24
+15.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−25%
14−16
+25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−18.2%
12−14
+18.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−21.4%
16−18
+21.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−23.8%
24−27
+23.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−18.2%
12−14
+18.2%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−16.7%
27−30
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−17.6%
20−22
+17.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−15%
21−24
+15%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−17.2%
30−35
+17.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5600M is 50% faster than the T2000 Mobile.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Pro 5600M surpassed T2000 Mobile in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 20.60 23.95
Recency 27 May 2019 15 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 50 Watt

The Radeon Pro 5600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T2000 Mobile in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro T2000 Mobile
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 252 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 69 votes

Rate AMD Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.