Radeon RX 6750 XT vs RTX A4000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A4000 Mobile with Radeon RX 6750 XT, including specs and performance data.

RTX A4000 Mobile
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
38.39

RX 6750 XT outperforms RTX A4000 Mobile by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12051
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data51.95
Power efficiency23.4414.83
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA104Navi 22
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)3 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51202560
Core clock speed1140 MHz2150 MHz
Boost clock speed1680 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate268.8416.0
Floating-point processing power17.2 TFLOPS13.31 TFLOPS
ROPs8064
TMUs160160
Tensor Cores160no data
Ray Tracing Cores4040

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX A4000 Mobile 38.39
RX 6750 XT 52.78
+37.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A4000 Mobile 15108
RX 6750 XT 20768
+37.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120−130
−38.3%
166
+38.3%
1440p60−65
−43.3%
86
+43.3%
4K35−40
−40%
49
+40%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.31
1440pno data6.38
4Kno data11.20

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
−125%
245
+125%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−102%
166
+102%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
−96.4%
165
+96.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
−61.5%
176
+61.5%
Battlefield 5 120−130
−19.7%
150−160
+19.7%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−58.5%
130
+58.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
−51.2%
127
+51.2%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−54.8%
178
+54.8%
Fortnite 150−160
−35.8%
210−220
+35.8%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−36.2%
190−200
+36.2%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
−103%
217
+103%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−20.7%
170−180
+20.7%
Valorant 210−220
−27.3%
270−280
+27.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+4.8%
104
−4.8%
Battlefield 5 120−130
−19.7%
150−160
+19.7%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−32.9%
109
+32.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−0.4%
270−280
+0.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
−29.8%
109
+29.8%
Dota 2 140−150
−8.5%
154
+8.5%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−47.8%
170
+47.8%
Fortnite 150−160
−35.8%
210−220
+35.8%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−36.2%
190−200
+36.2%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
−73.8%
186
+73.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130
−31.7%
162
+31.7%
Metro Exodus 85−90
−47.7%
127
+47.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−20.7%
170−180
+20.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
−96%
245
+96%
Valorant 210−220
−27.3%
270−280
+27.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
−19.7%
150−160
+19.7%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−17.1%
96
+17.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
−16.7%
98
+16.7%
Dota 2 140−150
+8.4%
131
−8.4%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−37.4%
158
+37.4%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−36.2%
190−200
+36.2%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
−30.8%
140−150
+30.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−20.7%
170−180
+20.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
−8%
135
+8%
Valorant 210−220
−27.3%
270−280
+27.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
−35.8%
210−220
+35.8%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
−40.4%
350−400
+40.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
−45.2%
106
+45.2%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−43.4%
76
+43.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 240−250
−22.9%
300−350
+22.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
−29.8%
120−130
+29.8%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−46.3%
60
+46.3%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−62.1%
141
+62.1%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−51%
150−160
+51%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
−30.8%
85−90
+30.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−55.2%
100−110
+55.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
−45.3%
130−140
+45.3%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
−44.8%
40−45
+44.8%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
−35.1%
104
+35.1%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−42.4%
47
+42.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−38.6%
79
+38.6%
Valorant 220−230
−32.6%
290−300
+32.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−43.1%
80−85
+43.1%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+63.6%
11
−63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−36.8%
26
+36.8%
Dota 2 100−110
+5%
101
−5%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−66%
78
+66%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−57.4%
100−110
+57.4%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−28.2%
50−55
+28.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−74.5%
80−85
+74.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
−56.5%
70−75
+56.5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how RTX A4000 Mobile and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT is 38% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 XT is 43% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6750 XT is 40% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A4000 Mobile is 64% faster.
  • in Atomic Heart, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 6750 XT is 125% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A4000 Mobile is ahead in 4 tests (6%)
  • RX 6750 XT is ahead in 58 tests (91%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.39 52.78
Recency 12 April 2021 3 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 250 Watt

RTX A4000 Mobile has 117.4% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 XT, on the other hand, has a 37.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A4000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6750 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile
RTX A4000
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Radeon RX 6750 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 21 vote

Rate RTX A4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2705 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A4000 Mobile or Radeon RX 6750 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.