GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs Radeon 760M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 760M and GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 760M
2024
15 Watt
14.06

RTX 3050 6 GB outperforms 760M by an impressive 92% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking392233
Place by popularitynot in top-10018
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data66.39
Power efficiency66.5427.36
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code namePhoenixGA107
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date31 January 2024 (1 year ago)2 February 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122304
Core clock speed800 MHz1042 MHz
Boost clock speed2599 MHz1470 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate83.17105.8
Floating-point processing power5.323 TFLOPS6.774 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs3272
Tensor Coresno data72
Ray Tracing Cores818

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared96 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data168.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 760M 14.06
RTX 3050 6 GB 26.99
+92%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 760M 5595
RTX 3050 6 GB 10739
+91.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30
−83.3%
55−60
+83.3%
1440p18
−66.7%
30−35
+66.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.25
1440pno data5.97

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 105
−90.5%
200−210
+90.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
−83.3%
55−60
+83.3%
Dead Island 2 50−55
−82.7%
95−100
+82.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−86.4%
110−120
+86.4%
Counter-Strike 2 77
−81.8%
140−150
+81.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
Dead Island 2 50−55
−82.7%
95−100
+82.7%
Far Cry 5 38
−84.2%
70−75
+84.2%
Fortnite 75−80
−79.5%
140−150
+79.5%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−75.4%
100−105
+75.4%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−90.5%
80−85
+90.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−90%
95−100
+90%
Valorant 110−120
−91.3%
220−230
+91.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−86.4%
110−120
+86.4%
Counter-Strike 2 33
−81.8%
60−65
+81.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
−87.2%
350−400
+87.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Dead Island 2 50−55
−82.7%
95−100
+82.7%
Dota 2 85−90
−81.8%
160−170
+81.8%
Far Cry 5 35
−85.7%
65−70
+85.7%
Fortnite 75−80
−79.5%
140−150
+79.5%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−75.4%
100−105
+75.4%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−90.5%
80−85
+90.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
−85.7%
65−70
+85.7%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−78.6%
50−55
+78.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−90%
95−100
+90%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
−80.6%
65−70
+80.6%
Valorant 110−120
−91.3%
220−230
+91.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−86.4%
110−120
+86.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−78.6%
50−55
+78.6%
Dead Island 2 50−55
−82.7%
95−100
+82.7%
Dota 2 85−90
−81.8%
160−170
+81.8%
Far Cry 5 33
−81.8%
60−65
+81.8%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−75.4%
100−105
+75.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−90%
95−100
+90%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
−73.9%
40−45
+73.9%
Valorant 110−120
−91.3%
220−230
+91.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
−79.5%
140−150
+79.5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16
−87.5%
30−33
+87.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
−86.3%
190−200
+86.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−90.5%
40−45
+90.5%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−88%
220−230
+88%
Valorant 140−150
−88.8%
270−280
+88.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−84.2%
70−75
+84.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Dead Island 2 21−24
−73.9%
40−45
+73.9%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−83.3%
55−60
+83.3%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−81.8%
60−65
+81.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−90.5%
40−45
+90.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−33
−83.3%
55−60
+83.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Dead Island 2 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−73.1%
45−50
+73.1%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Valorant 70−75
−89.2%
140−150
+89.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Dead Island 2 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Dota 2 45−50
−83.7%
90−95
+83.7%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−84.6%
24−27
+84.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
−84.6%
24−27
+84.6%

This is how Radeon 760M and RTX 3050 6 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 6 GB is 83% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 6 GB is 67% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.06 26.99
Chip lithography 4 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 70 Watt

Radeon 760M has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 366.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 6 GB, on the other hand, has a 92% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 760M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 309 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 2013 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 760M or GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.