GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs Radeon 760M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 760M with GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 760M
2023
15 Watt
14.29

RTX 3050 6 GB outperforms 760M by an impressive 87% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking358205
Place by popularitynot in top-10021
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data75.23
Power efficiency68.1827.34
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameHawx PointGA107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 December 2023 (1 year ago)2 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122304
Core clock speed800 MHz1042 MHz
Boost clock speed2599 MHz1470 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate83.17105.8
Floating-point processing power5.323 TFLOPS6.774 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs3272
Tensor Coresno data72
Ray Tracing Cores818

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared96 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data168.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 760M 14.29
RTX 3050 6 GB 26.74
+87.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 760M 5711
RTX 3050 6 GB 10685
+87.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD31
−77.4%
55−60
+77.4%
1440p19
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.25
1440pno data5.11

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 25
−80%
45−50
+80%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
−83.3%
55−60
+83.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−77.1%
85−90
+77.1%
Counter-Strike 2 19
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
−75%
21−24
+75%
Forza Horizon 4 51
−86.3%
95−100
+86.3%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−79.5%
70−75
+79.5%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−82.9%
75−80
+82.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−80.6%
65−70
+80.6%
Valorant 60−65
−83.3%
110−120
+83.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−77.1%
85−90
+77.1%
Counter-Strike 2 18
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Dota 2 23
−73.9%
40−45
+73.9%
Far Cry 5 29
−72.4%
50−55
+72.4%
Fortnite 80−85
−80.7%
150−160
+80.7%
Forza Horizon 4 44
−81.8%
80−85
+81.8%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−79.5%
70−75
+79.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 34
−76.5%
60−65
+76.5%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−82.9%
75−80
+82.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−86.9%
200−210
+86.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−80.6%
65−70
+80.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−77.8%
80−85
+77.8%
Valorant 60−65
−83.3%
110−120
+83.3%
World of Tanks 190−200
−82.3%
350−400
+82.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−77.1%
85−90
+77.1%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−73.1%
45−50
+73.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−72.4%
50−55
+72.4%
Dota 2 50−55
−79.2%
95−100
+79.2%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−81.8%
100−105
+81.8%
Forza Horizon 4 37
−75.7%
65−70
+75.7%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−79.5%
70−75
+79.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−86.9%
200−210
+86.9%
Valorant 60−65
−83.3%
110−120
+83.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 21−24
−81.8%
40−45
+81.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−81.8%
40−45
+81.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
−83.2%
240−250
+83.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−84.6%
24−27
+84.6%
World of Tanks 100−110
−82.7%
190−200
+82.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
−83.3%
55−60
+83.3%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−84.6%
24−27
+84.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−80.6%
65−70
+80.6%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−80.6%
65−70
+80.6%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−73.9%
40−45
+73.9%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−71.9%
55−60
+71.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−75%
35−40
+75%
Valorant 35−40
−75.7%
65−70
+75.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Dota 2 24−27
−73.1%
45−50
+73.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−73.1%
45−50
+73.1%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−81.8%
80−85
+81.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−73.1%
45−50
+73.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Dota 2 24−27
−73.1%
45−50
+73.1%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Fortnite 16−18
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Valorant 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%

This is how Radeon 760M and RTX 3050 6 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 6 GB is 77% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 6 GB is 84% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.29 26.74
Recency 6 December 2023 2 February 2024
Chip lithography 4 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 70 Watt

Radeon 760M has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 366.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 6 GB, on the other hand, has a 87.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 month.

The GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 760M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 760M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 218 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1484 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.