Radeon RX 7600 XT vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Place in the ranking	17	79
Place by popularity	not in top-100	83
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	7.24	78.12
Power efficiency	16.79	16.25
Architecture	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	AD102	Navi 33
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	3 December 2022 (2 years ago)	8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$6,799	$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7600 XT has 979% better value for money than RTX 6000 Ada Generation.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	18176	2048
Core clock speed	915 MHz	1980 MHz
Boost clock speed	2505 MHz	2755 MHz
Number of transistors	76,300 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	1,423	352.6
Floating-point processing power	91.06 TFLOPS	22.57 TFLOPS
ROPs	192	64
TMUs	568	128
Tensor Cores	568	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	142	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	267 mm	204 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	48 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	960.0 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.8	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.9	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 72.99
+63.1%

RX 7600 XT 44.76

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 28066
+63.1%

RX 7600 XT 17212

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	189 +71.8%	110−120 −71.8%
1440p	158 +66.3%	95−100 −66.3%
4K	118 +68.6%	70−75 −68.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	35.97 −1103%	2.99 +1103%
1440p	43.03 −1143%	3.46 +1143%
4K	57.62 −1126%	4.70 +1126%

RX 7600 XT has 1103% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RX 7600 XT has 1143% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RX 7600 XT has 1126% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	164 +64%	100−105 −64%
Elden Ring	280−290 +67.1%	170−180 −67.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +67.1%	70−75 −67.1%
Counter-Strike 2	163 +71.6%	95−100 −71.6%
Forza Horizon 4	400−450 +65.2%	250−260 −65.2%
Metro Exodus	113 +73.8%	65−70 −73.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	130−140 +67.5%	80−85 −67.5%
Valorant	350−400 +66.1%	230−240 −66.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +67.1%	70−75 −67.1%
Counter-Strike 2	155 +63.2%	95−100 −63.2%
Dota 2	160−170 +69%	100−105 −69%
Elden Ring	280−290 +67.1%	170−180 −67.1%
Far Cry 5	123 +64%	75−80 −64%
Fortnite	290−300 +70.6%	170−180 −70.6%
Forza Horizon 4	400−450 +65.2%	250−260 −65.2%
Grand Theft Auto V	160−170 +69%	100−105 −69%
Metro Exodus	106 +63.1%	65−70 −63.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +65.4%	130−140 −65.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	130−140 +67.5%	80−85 −67.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +74%	100−105 −74%
Valorant	350−400 +66.1%	230−240 −66.1%
World of Tanks	270−280 +64.1%	170−180 −64.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +67.1%	70−75 −67.1%
Counter-Strike 2	147 +63.3%	90−95 −63.3%
Far Cry 5	130−140 +71.3%	80−85 −71.3%
Forza Horizon 4	400−450 +65.2%	250−260 −65.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +65.4%	130−140 −65.4%
Valorant	350−400 +66.1%	230−240 −66.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	140−150 +65.9%	85−90 −65.9%
Elden Ring	190−200 +64.2%	120−130 −64.2%
Grand Theft Auto V	140−150 +65.9%	85−90 −65.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +75%	100−105 −75%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +69.1%	55−60 −69.1%
World of Tanks	500−550 +72%	300−310 −72%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +74%	50−55 −74%
Counter-Strike 2	131 +63.8%	80−85 −63.8%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +68.4%	95−100 −68.4%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +70.6%	160−170 −70.6%
Metro Exodus	99 +65%	60−65 −65%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	219 +68.5%	130−140 −68.5%
Valorant	300−350 +63.5%	200−210 −63.5%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	40 +66.7%	24−27 −66.7%
Dota 2	160−170 +64%	100−105 −64%
Elden Ring	100−110 +63.1%	65−70 −63.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	160−170 +64%	100−105 −64%
Metro Exodus	90 +63.6%	55−60 −63.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +74.2%	120−130 −74.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +82.9%	35−40 −82.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	160−170 +64%	100−105 −64%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +65.5%	55−60 −65.5%
Counter-Strike 2	90−95 +67.3%	55−60 −67.3%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +75%	60−65 −75%
Fortnite	95−100 +74.5%	55−60 −74.5%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +65.6%	90−95 −65.6%
Valorant	190−200 +72.7%	110−120 −72.7%

This is how RTX 6000 Ada Generation and RX 7600 XT compete in popular games:

RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 72% faster in 1080p
RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 66% faster in 1440p
RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 69% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	72.99	44.76
Recency	3 December 2022	8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	48 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	5 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	190 Watt

RTX 6000 Ada Generation has a 63.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

RX 7600 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 57.9% lower power consumption.

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 7600 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7600 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.