Radeon 760M vs GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB

Place in performance ranking	20	326
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	19.32	no data
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2022)	RDNA 3
GPU code name	Ampere GA102	Phoenix
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	11 January 2022 (2 years ago)	5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$799	no data
Current price	$1053 (1.3x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	8960	512
Core clock speed	no data	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	1260 MHz	2800 MHz
Number of transistors	28,300 million	25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	478.8	67.20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB and Radeon 760M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	285 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 12-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6X	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	384 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1710 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	912.4 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	Portable Device Dependent
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.6	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3080 12 GB 69.08
+352%

Radeon 760M 15.30

GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB outperforms Radeon 760M by 352% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 3080 12 GB 26681
+351%

Radeon 760M 5911

GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB outperforms Radeon 760M by 351% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 3080 12 GB 217116
+2161%

Radeon 760M 9603

GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB outperforms Radeon 760M by 2161% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 3080 12 GB 44533
+35%

Radeon 760M 32985

GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB outperforms Radeon 760M by 35% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 3080 12 GB 35922
+485%

Radeon 760M 6142

GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB outperforms Radeon 760M by 485% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 3080 12 GB 549644
+1216%

Radeon 760M 41767

GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB outperforms Radeon 760M by 1216% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	179 +477%	31 −477%
1440p	120 +400%	24−27 −400%
4K	86 +378%	18−20 −378%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

130−140

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	120−130	no data
Battlefield 5	220−230	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	130−140	no data
Far Cry 5	110−120	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	160−170	no data
Forza Horizon 4	210−220	no data
Hitman 3	120−130	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	351	no data
Metro Exodus	140−150	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	422	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	118	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	120−130	no data
Battlefield 5	220−230	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	130−140	no data
Far Cry 5	110−120	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	160−170	no data
Forza Horizon 4	210−220	no data
Hitman 3	65	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	290−300	no data
Metro Exodus	66	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	356	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	321	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	120−130	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	130−140	no data
Far Cry 5	110−120	no data
Forza Horizon 4	210−220	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	263	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	314	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	165	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	95	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	160−170	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	140−150	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	85−90	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75	no data
Far Cry 5	147	no data
Forza Horizon 4	160−170	no data
Hitman 3	100−110	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	206	no data
Metro Exodus	116	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	236	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	84	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70	no data
Hitman 3	78	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	83	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	132	no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35	no data
Far Cry 5	50−55	no data
Forza Horizon 4	110−120	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	125	no data
Metro Exodus	98	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	55	no data