Radeon RX 7600 XT vs 760M

Place in performance ranking	326	66
Place by popularity	not in top-100	70
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	29.85
Architecture	RDNA 3	RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code name	Phoenix	Navi 33
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	5 January 2023 (1 year ago)	8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$329
Current price	no data	$477 (1.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	2048
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2800 MHz	2755 MHz
Number of transistors	25,390 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	67.20	352.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon 760M and Radeon RX 7600 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	204 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	16 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	no data	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 760M 15.30

RX 7600 XT 45.13
+195%

RX 7600 XT outperforms 760M by 195% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Radeon 760M 5909

RX 7600 XT 17429
+195%

RX 7600 XT outperforms 760M by 195% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−190%

90−95
+190%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−11

−200%

30
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −210%	30−35 +210%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −213%	24−27 +213%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −213%	50−55 +213%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −210%	30−35 +210%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −200%	24 +200%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −200%	35−40 +200%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −200%	40−45 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −200%	70−75 +200%
Hitman 3	10−11 −200%	30−33 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −239%	60−65 +239%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −219%	50−55 +219%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −207%	40−45 +207%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −219%	51 +219%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −206%	45−50 +206%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −210%	30−35 +210%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −213%	24−27 +213%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −213%	50−55 +213%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −210%	30−35 +210%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −200%	18 +200%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −200%	35−40 +200%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −200%	40−45 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −200%	70−75 +200%
Hitman 3	10−11 −200%	30−33 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −239%	60−65 +239%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −219%	50−55 +219%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −207%	40−45 +207%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −214%	44 +214%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −200%	36 +200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −206%	45−50 +206%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −210%	30−35 +210%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −213%	24−27 +213%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −210%	30−35 +210%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −200%	24−27 +200%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −200%	35−40 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −200%	70−75 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −239%	60−65 +239%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −208%	37 +208%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −229%	23 +229%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −206%	45−50 +206%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−207%

40−45
+207%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −200%	30−33 +200%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −211%	27−30 +211%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −200%	14−16 +200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −200%	12−14 +200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −217%	18−20 +217%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −213%	24−27 +213%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −222%	27−30 +222%
Hitman 3	6−7 −200%	18−20 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −210%	30−35 +210%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −200%	27−30 +200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −211%	27−30 +211%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −220%	16−18 +220%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9
−213%

24−27

+213%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −200%	14−16 +200%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
Hitman 3	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −220%	16−18 +220%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	2−3
Far Cry 5	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −200%	21−24 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −220%	16−18 +220%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −200%	14−16 +200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%