RTX A2000 Mobile vs Quadro T1000 Max-Q

Place in performance ranking	292	196
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	N19P-Q1	GA107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	2560
Core clock speed	795 / 1230 MHz	893 MHz
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	1687 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 - 40 Watt	95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	75.60	108.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro T1000 Max-Q and RTX A2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	176.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
CUDA	7.5	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	50−55 −58%	79 +58%
1440p	27−30 −51.9%	41 +51.9%
4K	24−27 −58.3%	38 +58.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

27−30

−174%

74
+174%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −38.9%	50−55 +38.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −83.3%	55 +83.3%
Battlefield 5	55−60 −39%	80−85 +39%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −48.9%	65−70 +48.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −130%	62 +130%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −113%	96 +113%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −53.2%	72 +53.2%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −39.3%	85−90 +39.3%
Hitman 3	45−50 −69.4%	83 +69.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −86.5%	69 +86.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −41.4%	40−45 +41.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −78.4%	66 +78.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −87.9%	62 +87.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −38.9%	50−55 +38.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −30%	39 +30%
Battlefield 5	55−60 −39%	80−85 +39%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −48.9%	65−70 +48.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −85.2%	50 +85.2%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −95.6%	88 +95.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −51.1%	71 +51.1%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −39.3%	85−90 +39.3%
Hitman 3	45−50 −55.1%	76 +55.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −54.1%	57 +54.1%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −63%	44 +63%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −41.4%	40−45 +41.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −62.2%	60 +62.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −159%	96 +159%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −54.5%	51 +54.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −38.9%	50−55 +38.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −6.7%	32 +6.7%
Battlefield 5	55−60 −39%	80−85 +39%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −51.9%	41 +51.9%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −84.4%	83 +84.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −25.5%	59 +25.5%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −39.3%	85−90 +39.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −35.1%	50 +35.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +13.8%	29 −13.8%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −50%	35−40 +50%
Hitman 3	27−30 −71.4%	48 +71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −78.3%	41 +78.3%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −68.8%	27 +68.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −46.2%	18−20 +46.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −81.8%	40 +81.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −55.6%	27−30 +55.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −80%	27 +80%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −50%	55−60 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −150%	25 +150%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −82.8%	53 +82.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −48.5%	49 +48.5%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −51.4%	50−55 +51.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −72.2%	30−35 +72.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 −81.8%	20 +81.8%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −66.7%	20−22 +66.7%
Hitman 3	16−18 −50%	24−27 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −54.5%	16−18 +54.5%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −77.8%	16−18 +77.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −54.5%	17 +54.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −94.1%	33 +94.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −60%	16−18 +60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Battlefield 5	18−20 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −85.7%	26 +85.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −47.1%	24−27 +47.1%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −50%	35−40 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%

This is how T1000 Max-Q and RTX A2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX A2000 Mobile is 58% faster than T1000 Max-Q in 1080p
RTX A2000 Mobile is 51.9% faster than T1000 Max-Q in 1440p
RTX A2000 Mobile is 58.3% faster than T1000 Max-Q in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1000 Max-Q is 13.8% faster than the RTX A2000 Mobile.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX A2000 Mobile is 174% faster than the T1000 Max-Q.

All in all, in popular games:

T1000 Max-Q is ahead in 1 test (1%)
RTX A2000 Mobile is ahead in 67 tests (99%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	17.38	25.54
Recency	27 May 2019	12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	95 Watt