T600 vs Quadro T1000 Max-Q

Place in performance ranking	290	300
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	no data	25.76
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	N19P-Q1	TU117
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price	no data	$143

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	640
Core clock speed	795 / 1230 MHz	735 MHz
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	1335 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 - 40 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	75.60	53.40

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro T1000 Max-Q and T600 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.6	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
CUDA	7.5	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1000 Max-Q 17.36
+4%

T600 16.70

Quadro T1000 Max-Q outperforms T600 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

T1000 Max-Q 6723
+4%

T600 6464

Quadro T1000 Max-Q outperforms T600 by 4% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	55−60 +1.9%	54 −1.9%
1440p	21−24 −9.5%	23 +9.5%
4K	18−21 −11.1%	20 +11.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

27−30
+3.8%

24−27

−3.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +2.9%	35−40 −2.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +3.4%	27−30 −3.4%
Battlefield 5	55−60 +3.5%	55−60 −3.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +4.7%	40−45 −4.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +3.8%	24−27 −3.8%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +0%	46 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +4.4%	45−50 −4.4%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +5.2%	55−60 −5.2%
Hitman 3	45−50 +4.3%	45−50 −4.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +5.7%	35−40 −5.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 +3.6%	27−30 −3.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +5.7%	35−40 −5.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +3.1%	30−35 −3.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +2.9%	35−40 −2.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +3.4%	27−30 −3.4%
Battlefield 5	55−60 +3.5%	55−60 −3.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +4.7%	40−45 −4.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +3.8%	24−27 −3.8%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +9.5%	42 −9.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +4.4%	45−50 −4.4%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +5.2%	55−60 −5.2%
Hitman 3	45−50 +4.3%	45−50 −4.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +5.7%	35−40 −5.7%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +3.8%	26 −3.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 +3.6%	27−30 −3.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +5.7%	35−40 −5.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −29.7%	48 +29.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +3.1%	30−35 −3.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +2.9%	35−40 −2.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +3.4%	27−30 −3.4%
Battlefield 5	55−60 +3.5%	55−60 −3.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +3.8%	24−27 −3.8%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +17.9%	39 −17.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +4.4%	45−50 −4.4%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +5.2%	55−60 −5.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +37%	27 −37%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +3.1%	30−35 −3.1%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +4%	24−27 −4%
Hitman 3	27−30 +7.7%	24−27 −7.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +6.7%	15 −6.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +5.9%	16−18 −5.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +5.6%	35−40 −5.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +11.5%	26 −11.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +6.5%	30−35 −6.5%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +6.1%	30−35 −6.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Hitman 3	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Metro Exodus	9−10 +12.5%	8 −12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +6.3%	16 −6.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Battlefield 5	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +16.7%	12 −16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +4.3%	21−24 −4.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

This is how T1000 Max-Q and T600 compete in popular games:

T1000 Max-Q is 1.9% faster than T600 in 1080p
T600 is 9.5% faster than T1000 Max-Q in 1440p
T600 is 11.1% faster than T1000 Max-Q in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1000 Max-Q is 37% faster than the T600.
in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the T600 is 29.7% faster than the T1000 Max-Q.

All in all, in popular games: