AMD Radeon Pro 5600M vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

P4000 Max-Q
22.75

Radeon Pro 5600M outperforms Quadro P4000 Max-Q by 5% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking225210
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money9.01no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code nameN17E-Q3 Max-QNavi 10
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date11 January 2017 (7 years old)15 June 2020 (3 years old)
Current price$803 no data
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922560
Core clock speed1113 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1240 MHz1265 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate137.5164.8
Floating-point performance4,398 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro P4000 Max-Q and Radeon Pro 5600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed6006 MHz1540 MBps
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s394.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA6.1no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P4000 Max-Q 22.75
Pro 5600M 23.95
+5.3%

Radeon Pro 5600M outperforms Quadro P4000 Max-Q by 5% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

P4000 Max-Q 8815
Pro 5600M 9282
+5.3%

Radeon Pro 5600M outperforms Quadro P4000 Max-Q by 5% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD96
−4.2%
100−110
+4.2%
4K33
+10%
30−35
−10%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−5.4%
35−40
+5.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−4.3%
45−50
+4.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−5%
40−45
+5%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−4%
75−80
+4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
−6.8%
60−65
+6.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−5.4%
35−40
+5.4%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−5%
60−65
+5%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−3.3%
60−65
+3.3%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−3.9%
80−85
+3.9%
Hitman 3 65−70
−7.5%
70−75
+7.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−4.1%
50−55
+4.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−5.4%
35−40
+5.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−6%
50−55
+6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−4.5%
45−50
+4.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−4.3%
45−50
+4.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−5%
40−45
+5%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−4%
75−80
+4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
−6.8%
60−65
+6.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−5.4%
35−40
+5.4%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−5%
60−65
+5%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−3.3%
60−65
+3.3%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−3.9%
80−85
+3.9%
Hitman 3 65−70
−7.5%
70−75
+7.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−4.1%
50−55
+4.1%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−5.4%
35−40
+5.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−6%
50−55
+6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+46.3%
50−55
−46.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−4.5%
45−50
+4.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−4.3%
45−50
+4.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−5%
40−45
+5%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−4%
75−80
+4%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−5.4%
35−40
+5.4%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−5%
60−65
+5%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−3.3%
60−65
+3.3%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−3.9%
80−85
+3.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 42
−28.6%
50−55
+28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−4.5%
45−50
+4.5%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−5.7%
35−40
+5.7%
Hitman 3 35−40
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−6.7%
30−35
+6.7%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−6.7%
30−35
+6.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−4%
24−27
+4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−3.9%
50−55
+3.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−5.1%
40−45
+5.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−4.5%
45−50
+4.5%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−6.5%
45−50
+6.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−7.7%
27−30
+7.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Hitman 3 21−24
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+11.5%
24−27
−11.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−3.7%
27−30
+3.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−5.3%
20−22
+5.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−4.5%
21−24
+4.5%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−6.3%
30−35
+6.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%

This is how P4000 Max-Q and Pro 5600M compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • Pro 5600M is 4.2% faster than P4000 Max-Q

4K resolution:

  • P4000 Max-Q is 10% faster than Pro 5600M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the P4000 Max-Q is 46.3% faster than the Pro 5600M.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5600M is 28.6% faster than the P4000 Max-Q.

All in all, in popular games:

  • P4000 Max-Q is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • Pro 5600M is ahead in 66 tests (97%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 22.75 23.95
Recency 11 January 2017 15 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 50 Watt

We couldn't decide between Quadro P4000 Max-Q and Radeon Pro 5600M. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


This video card has no user ratings yet.

Rate NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 69 votes

Rate AMD Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.