NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro 5600M

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in our rating
 
Value for money (0-100)
1.38
 
no data
Architecture
Pascal
 
Navi / RDNA
GPU code name
N17E-Q5
 
Navi 10
Market segment
Mobile workstation
 
Mobile workstation
Launch date
11 January 2017 (4 years ago)
 
15 June 2020 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)
$1,885
 
no data
Price now
$2137
 
no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores
2048
 
2560
Core clock speed
1164 MHz
 
no data
Boost clock
1506 MHz
 
1265 MHz
Transistor count
7,200 million
 
no data
Manufacturing process technology
16 nm
 
7 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)
100 Watt
 
50 Watt
Texture fill rate
202.5
 
164.8
Floating-point performance
6,197 gflops
 
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro P5000 Mobile and Radeon Pro 5600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size
large
 
medium sized
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
 
PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
no data
 
None

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type
GDDR5
 
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
16 GB
 
8 GB
Memory bus width
256 Bit
 
2048 Bit
Memory clock speed
6006 MHz
 
1540 MBps
Memory bandwidth
192 GB/s
 
394.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
 
-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones. OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors
No outputs
 
No outputs
Display Port
1.4
 
no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus
+
 
-
3D Stereo
+
 
no data
Mosaic
+
 
no data
nView Display Management
+
 
no data
Optimus
+
 
no data

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX
12
 
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
 
6.5
OpenGL
4.5
 
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
 
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
 
1.2
CUDA
6.1
 
-

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P5000 Mobile 31.55 +185.5%
Pro 5600M 11.05

Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P5000 Mobile 11561 +16.6%
Pro 5600M 9911

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile

185.5% faster (about 3 times) in synthetic tests

Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)

PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)

Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M

Much newer (15 June 2020 vs 11 January 2017)

Wider memory bus (2048 vs 256 bit)

More pipelines (2560 vs 2048)

Higher memory bandwidth (394.2 vs 192 GB/s)

Finer manufacturing process technology (7 vs 16 nm)

Lower power consumption (50 vs 100 watts)

So, Quadro P5000 Mobile or Pro 5600M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile, since it shows better performance.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Like
Like

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.