Quadro T1000 vs P3000 Mobile

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad
Buy on Amazon

Aggregated performance score

P3000 Mobile
2017
6GB GDDR5
19.22
+13.1%

P3000 Mobile outperforms T1000 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking273297
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.808.57
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameN17E-Q1TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date11 January 2017 (7 years ago)27 May 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price$537 $920

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

P3000 Mobile has 14% better value for money than Quadro T1000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed1088 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1215 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate97.20no data
Floating-point performance3,110 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P3000 Mobile and Quadro T1000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed7008 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth168 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212.0 (12_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data
CUDA6.1no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD64
+16.4%
55−60
−16.4%
4K28
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+16.4%
55−60
−16.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+25%
40−45
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+25%
40−45
−25%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+15.6%
45−50
−15.6%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+20%
55−60
−20%
Hitman 3 55−60
+22.2%
45−50
−22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+16.4%
55−60
−16.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+25%
40−45
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+25%
40−45
−25%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+15.6%
45−50
−15.6%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+20%
55−60
−20%
Hitman 3 55−60
+22.2%
45−50
−22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
+14.5%
55−60
−14.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+16.4%
55−60
−16.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+25%
40−45
−25%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+15.6%
45−50
−15.6%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+20%
55−60
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Hitman 3 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Hitman 3 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

This is how P3000 Mobile and Quadro T1000 compete in popular games:

  • P3000 Mobile is 16% faster in 1080p
  • P3000 Mobile is 17% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.22 17.00
Recency 11 January 2017 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 50 Watt

The Quadro P3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Quadro T1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile
Quadro P3000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 127 votes

Rate Quadro P3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 301 vote

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.