Quadro RTX 8000 vs P3000 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	270	53
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	9.88	9.65
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	N17E-Q1	TU102
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	11 January 2017 (7 years old)	13 August 2018 (5 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$9,999
Current price	$537	$3230 (0.3x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

P3000 Mobile has 2% better value for money than RTX 8000.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	4608
Core clock speed	1088 MHz	1395 MHz
Boost clock speed	1215 MHz	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	260 Watt
Texture fill rate	97.20	509.8
Floating-point performance	3,110 gflops	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro P3000 Mobile and Quadro RTX 8000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	48 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	168 GB/s	672.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Display Port	1.4	no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	6.1	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	64 −150%	160−170 +150%
4K	28 −150%	70−75 +150%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−33

−150%

75−80
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −156%	100−105 +156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 −158%	85−90 +158%
Battlefield 5	60−65 −150%	160−170 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −160%	130−140 +160%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −150%	75−80 +150%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −160%	130−140 +160%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −150%	130−140 +150%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −158%	170−180 +158%
Hitman 3	55−60 −155%	140−150 +155%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −144%	100−105 +144%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −150%	80−85 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −144%	100−105 +144%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −157%	95−100 +157%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −156%	100−105 +156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 −158%	85−90 +158%
Battlefield 5	60−65 −150%	160−170 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −160%	130−140 +160%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −150%	75−80 +150%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −160%	130−140 +160%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −150%	130−140 +150%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −158%	170−180 +158%
Hitman 3	55−60 −155%	140−150 +155%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −144%	100−105 +144%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −158%	80−85 +158%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −150%	80−85 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −144%	100−105 +144%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	63 −154%	160−170 +154%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −157%	95−100 +157%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −156%	100−105 +156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 −158%	85−90 +158%
Battlefield 5	60−65 −150%	160−170 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −150%	75−80 +150%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −160%	130−140 +160%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −150%	130−140 +150%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −158%	170−180 +158%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	33 −158%	85−90 +158%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −157%	95−100 +157%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −159%	75−80 +159%
Hitman 3	30−35 −158%	80−85 +158%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −150%	65−70 +150%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −150%	45−50 +150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −160%	65−70 +160%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 −150%	50−55 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −150%	45−50 +150%
Battlefield 5	40−45 −138%	100−105 +138%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −145%	27−30 +145%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −150%	80−85 +150%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −157%	95−100 +157%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −156%	100−105 +156%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −138%	50−55 +138%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −131%	30−33 +131%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
Hitman 3	18−20 −150%	45−50 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Metro Exodus	10−12 −145%	27−30 +145%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −140%	24−27 +140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −131%	30−33 +131%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	22 −150%	55−60 +150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −140%	24−27 +140%
Battlefield 5	21−24 −150%	55−60 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −150%	45−50 +150%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −159%	70−75 +159%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −125%	18−20 +125%

This is how P3000 Mobile and RTX 8000 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

RTX 8000 is 150% faster than P3000 Mobile

4K resolution:

RTX 8000 is 150% faster than P3000 Mobile

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	19.19	50.01
Recency	11 January 2017	13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	48 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	260 Watt