Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro P3000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P3000 Mobile with Iris Xe Graphics G7, including specs and performance data.

P3000 Mobile
2017
6 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
16.87
+59%

P3000 Mobile outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by an impressive 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking325435
Place by popularitynot in top-10018
Power efficiency15.48no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGP104Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date11 January 2017 (8 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128096
Core clock speed1088 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1215 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate97.20no data
Floating-point processing power3.11 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs80no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR4
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1753 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth168 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12DirectX 12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P3000 Mobile 16.87
+59%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 10.61

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

P3000 Mobile 12105
+80.4%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 6710

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

P3000 Mobile 9256
+92%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 4820

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

P3000 Mobile 63332
+66.5%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 38040

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65
+62.5%
40−45
−62.5%
4K31
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%
Elden Ring 50−55
+73.3%
30−33
−73.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+64.3%
40−45
−64.3%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+70.4%
27−30
−70.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+42.9%
27−30
−42.9%
Valorant 65−70
+70%
40−45
−70%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%
Dota 2 60−65
+57.9%
35−40
−57.9%
Elden Ring 50−55
+73.3%
30−33
−73.3%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+39.5%
40−45
−39.5%
Fortnite 90−95
+48.4%
60−65
−48.4%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+64.3%
40−45
−64.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+57.9%
35−40
−57.9%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+58.6%
27−30
−58.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+45.7%
80−85
−45.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+42.9%
27−30
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+62.5%
30−35
−62.5%
Valorant 65−70
+70%
40−45
−70%
World of Tanks 200−210
+38.4%
150−160
−38.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%
Dota 2 60−65
+57.9%
35−40
−57.9%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+39.5%
40−45
−39.5%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+64.3%
40−45
−64.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+45.7%
80−85
−45.7%
Valorant 65−70
+70%
40−45
−70%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Elden Ring 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+65.3%
95−100
−65.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
World of Tanks 110−120
+67.1%
70−75
−67.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+61.9%
21−24
−61.9%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+87%
21−24
−87%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+81%
21−24
−81%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Valorant 40−45
+59.3%
27−30
−59.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Dota 2 27−30
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
Elden Ring 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+66.7%
30−33
−66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Dota 2 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+61.5%
12−14
−61.5%
Fortnite 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+84.6%
12−14
−84.6%
Valorant 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High Preset

Valorant 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

This is how P3000 Mobile and Iris Xe Graphics G7 compete in popular games:

  • P3000 Mobile is 63% faster in 1080p
  • P3000 Mobile is 72% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the P3000 Mobile is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • P3000 Mobile is ahead in 34 tests (76%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.87 10.61
Recency 11 January 2017 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 16 nm 10 nm

P3000 Mobile has a 59% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile
Quadro P3000 Mobile
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 162 votes

Rate Quadro P3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2626 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.