NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile: specs and benchmarks



NVIDIA started Quadro T1000 Mobile sales 27 May 2019. This is a Turing architecture notebook card based on 12 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 4 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 8 GHz are supplied, and together with 128 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 128.0 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is card attached via PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. Power consumption is at 50 Watt.

It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 16.80% of a leader's which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

RTX 4090GeForce RTX4090

General info

Some basic facts about Quadro T1000 Mobile: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in performance ranking274
Value for money4.08
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)
GPU code nameN19P-Q1
Market segmentMobile workstation
Release date27 May 2019 (4 years old)
Current price$1890 of 168889 (A100 PCIe 80 GB)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Technical specs

Quadro T1000 Mobile's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro T1000 Mobile's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)
Core clock speed1395 MHzof 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Boost clock speed1455 MHzof 3599 (Radeon RX 7990 XTX)
Number of transistors4,700 millionof 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile)
Manufacturing process technology12 nmof 4 (GeForce RTX 4080)
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattof 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)
Texture fill rate69.84of 969.9 (H100 SXM5 96 GB)

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro T1000 Mobile's compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16


Parameters of memory installed on Quadro T1000 Mobile: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory typeGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GBof 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory bus width128 Bitof 19000 (GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB)
Memory clock speed8000 MHzof 22400 (GeForce RTX 4080)
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/sof 3276 (Aldebaran)
Shared memory-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro T1000 Mobile. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs

API support

APIs supported by Quadro T1000 Mobile, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.5

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of Quadro T1000 Mobile. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1000 Mobile 16.80


This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

T1000 Mobile 6540

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 16%

T1000 Mobile 31509

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 16%

T1000 Mobile 11377

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark coverage: 14%

T1000 Mobile 7783

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

T1000 Mobile 8727

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

T1000 Mobile 53629

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

T1000 Mobile 375510

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

T1000 Mobile 110

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

T1000 Mobile 56

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 medical-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

T1000 Mobile 30

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

T1000 Mobile 88

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

T1000 Mobile 80

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

T1000 Mobile 7

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

Benchmark coverage: 2%

T1000 Mobile 56

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark coverage: 2%

T1000 Mobile 88

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

Benchmark coverage: 2%

T1000 Mobile 79

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

Benchmark coverage: 2%

T1000 Mobile 30

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

Benchmark coverage: 2%

T1000 Mobile 6.8

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

Benchmark coverage: 2%

T1000 Mobile 94

SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max

This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games.

Benchmark coverage: 1%

T1000 Mobile 94

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Quadro T1000 Mobile is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

Full HD64

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
Battlefield 5 60
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 61
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
Far Cry 5 62
Far Cry New Dawn 48
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
Hitman 3 45−50
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
Red Dead Redemption 2 47
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 57
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 43
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
Battlefield 5 52
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
Far Cry 5 57
Far Cry New Dawn 46
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
Hitman 3 45−50
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
Metro Exodus 34
Red Dead Redemption 2 25
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 48
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 29
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
Battlefield 5 47
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
Far Cry 5 53
Far Cry New Dawn 43
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35

High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
Hitman 3 27−30
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
Metro Exodus 14−16
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24

Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
Battlefield 5 35−40
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
Far Cry 5 27−30
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11

High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
Hitman 3 16−18
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
Metro Exodus 9−10
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18

Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
Battlefield 5 18−20
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
Far Cry 5 12−14
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7

Relative perfomance

Overall Quadro T1000 Mobile performance compared to nearest competitors among mobile workstation video cards.

AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to Quadro T1000 Mobile is Radeon Pro 5500M, which is faster by 4% and higher by 7 positions in our ranking.

Pro 5500MRadeon Pro5500M

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro T1000 Mobile:

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

T1000 Max-QQuadro T1000Max-Q
T600 MobileQuadro T600Mobile
Pro 5500MRadeon Pro5500M
T2000 Max-QQuadro T2000Max-Q
Pro 5300MRadeon Pro5300M
P2000 MobileQuadro P2000Mobile

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with Quadro T1000 Mobile according to our statistics.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.

3.8 89 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Quadro T1000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.