Radeon Pro W6600M vs GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Place in the ranking	239	207
Place by popularity	47	not in top-100
Power efficiency	21.78	20.94
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GA107	Navi 23
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	11 May 2021 (3 years ago)	8 June 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	1792
Core clock speed	712 MHz	1224 MHz
Boost clock speed	1057 MHz	2034 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	90 Watt
Texture fill rate	67.65	227.8
Floating-point processing power	4.329 TFLOPS	7.29 TFLOPS
ROPs	40	64
TMUs	64	112
Tensor Cores	64	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	16	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	8.6	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3050 Mobile 22.65

Pro W6600M 26.13
+15.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3050 Mobile 9122

Pro W6600M 10525
+15.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	93 −7.5%	100−110 +7.5%
1440p	52 −5.8%	55−60 +5.8%
4K	33 −6.1%	35−40 +6.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	40−45 −20.9%	50−55 +20.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	106 +89.3%	55−60 −89.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 −12.3%	80−85 +12.3%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 −20.9%	50−55 +20.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	73 +30.4%	55−60 −30.4%
Forza Horizon 4	156 +27.9%	120−130 −27.9%
Forza Horizon 5	97 +34.7%	70−75 −34.7%
Metro Exodus	110 +54.9%	70−75 −54.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −13.5%	55−60 +13.5%
Valorant	95−100 −14.7%	100−110 +14.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 −12.3%	80−85 +12.3%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 −20.9%	50−55 +20.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	56 +0%	55−60 +0%
Dota 2	142 +52.7%	90−95 −52.7%
Far Cry 5	130 +60.5%	80−85 −60.5%
Fortnite	120−130 −11.7%	130−140 +11.7%
Forza Horizon 4	123 +0.8%	120−130 −0.8%
Forza Horizon 5	74 +2.8%	70−75 −2.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	128 +39.1%	90−95 −39.1%
Metro Exodus	74 +4.2%	70−75 −4.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 −9.2%	160−170 +9.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −13.5%	55−60 +13.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 −18.4%	90−95 +18.4%
Valorant	95−100 −14.7%	100−110 +14.7%
World of Tanks	250−260 −5.6%	260−270 +5.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 −12.3%	80−85 +12.3%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 −20.9%	50−55 +20.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	51 −9.8%	55−60 +9.8%
Dota 2	155 +66.7%	90−95 −66.7%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −9.5%	80−85 +9.5%
Forza Horizon 4	106 −15.1%	120−130 +15.1%
Forza Horizon 5	69 −4.3%	70−75 +4.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 −9.2%	160−170 +9.2%
Valorant	95−100 −14.7%	100−110 +14.7%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	57 +21.3%	45−50 −21.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	57 +21.3%	45−50 −21.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 −3.2%	120−130 +3.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −13.6%	24−27 +13.6%
World of Tanks	150−160 −13.3%	170−180 +13.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −14.6%	55−60 +14.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	28 +16.7%	24−27 −16.7%
Far Cry 5	65−70 −20.6%	80−85 +20.6%
Forza Horizon 4	78 +5.4%	70−75 −5.4%
Forza Horizon 5	47 +6.8%	40−45 −6.8%
Metro Exodus	69 +11.3%	60−65 −11.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −20%	40−45 +20%
Valorant	60−65 −20.6%	75−80 +20.6%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Dota 2	57 +18.8%	45−50 −18.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	57 +18.8%	45−50 −18.8%
Metro Exodus	23 +9.5%	21−24 −9.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 −16.7%	80−85 +16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −13.3%	16−18 +13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	57 +18.8%	45−50 −18.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −20.8%	27−30 +20.8%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	12 +20%	10−11 −20%
Dota 2	93 +93.8%	45−50 −93.8%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −19.4%	35−40 +19.4%
Fortnite	27−30 −20.7%	35−40 +20.7%
Forza Horizon 4	45 +4.7%	40−45 −4.7%
Forza Horizon 5	24 +0%	24−27 +0%
Valorant	30−33 −23.3%	35−40 +23.3%

This is how RTX 3050 Mobile and Pro W6600M compete in popular games:

Pro W6600M is 8% faster in 1080p
Pro W6600M is 6% faster in 1440p
Pro W6600M is 6% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3050 Mobile is 94% faster.
in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro W6600M is 23% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 3050 Mobile is ahead in 25 tests (40%)
Pro W6600M is ahead in 34 tests (54%)
there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	22.65	26.13
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	90 Watt

RTX 3050 Mobile has 20% lower power consumption.

Pro W6600M, on the other hand, has a 15.4% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro W6600M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.