Radeon Pro W6600M vs GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 238 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 23.34 |
| Architecture | Ampere (2020−2025) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | GA107 | Navi 23 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 11 May 2021 (4 years ago) | 8 June 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 712 MHz | 1224 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1057 MHz | 2034 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 11,060 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 90 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 67.65 | 227.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 4.329 TFLOPS | 7.29 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 |
| TMUs | 64 | 112 |
| Tensor Cores | 64 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 28 |
| L0 Cache | no data | 448 KB |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | no data | 32 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1375 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 176.0 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 8.6 | - |
| DLSS | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 90 Watt |
RTX 3050 Max-Q has 157% lower power consumption.
Pro W6600M, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q and Radeon Pro W6600M. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
