GeForce 7000M vs Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and GeForce 7000M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) outperforms 7000M by a whopping 20133% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 589 | 1487 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 27.91 | no data |
Architecture | Vega (2017−2020) | no data |
GPU code name | Vega Renoir | C67 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 7 January 2020 (5 years ago) | 1 February 2006 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 3 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 1 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | 350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 90 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | no data | shared Memory |
Shared memory | + | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12_1 | shared Memory |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 20 | -0−1 |
1440p | 22 | -0−1 |
4K | 17 | -0−1 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+100%
|
6−7
−100%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 11
+450%
|
2−3
−450%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 18−20 | 0−1 |
Counter-Strike 2 | 9
+50%
|
6−7
−50%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 26
+420%
|
5−6
−420%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 16 | 0−1 |
Metro Exodus | 14 | 0−1 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 22
+633%
|
3−4
−633%
|
Valorant | 25 | 0−1 |
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 18−20 | 0−1 |
Counter-Strike 2 | 8
+33.3%
|
6−7
−33.3%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
Dota 2 | 24 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 26
+420%
|
5−6
−420%
|
Fortnite | 35−40 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 21
+320%
|
5−6
−320%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 12−14 | 0−1 |
Grand Theft Auto V | 15 | 0−1 |
Metro Exodus | 14−16 | 0−1 |
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 39
+875%
|
4−5
−875%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
+500%
|
3−4
−500%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
+375%
|
4−5
−375%
|
Valorant | 12 | 0−1 |
World of Tanks | 56
+600%
|
8−9
−600%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 18−20 | 0−1 |
Counter-Strike 2 | 7
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+550%
|
2−3
−550%
|
Dota 2 | 40 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+460%
|
5−6
−460%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 18
+260%
|
5−6
−260%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 12−14 | 0−1 |
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50−55
+1150%
|
4−5
−1150%
|
Valorant | 19 | 0−1 |
1440p
High Preset
Dota 2 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
Grand Theft Auto V | 7−8 | 0−1 |
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40 | 0−1 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
World of Tanks | 40−45 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 10−11 | 0−1 |
Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+225%
|
4−5
−225%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 5 | 9−10 | 0−1 |
Metro Exodus | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
+200%
|
3−4
−200%
|
Valorant | 16−18
+300%
|
4−5
−300%
|
4K
High Preset
Dota 2 | 16−18
+13.3%
|
14−16
−13.3%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+13.3%
|
14−16
−13.3%
|
Metro Exodus | 2−3 | 0−1 |
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18 | 0−1 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+13.3%
|
14−16
−13.3%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 19
+26.7%
|
14−16
−26.7%
|
Far Cry 5 | 7−8 | 0−1 |
Fortnite | 5−6 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 5 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
Valorant | 6−7 | 0−1 |
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 1150% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is ahead in 27 tests (93%)
- there's a draw in 2 tests (7%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 6.07 | 0.03 |
Recency | 7 January 2020 | 1 February 2006 |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 90 nm |
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has a 20133.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7000M in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.