Tesla M2090 vs GeForce GTX 960M

Place in the ranking	483	458
Place by popularity	93	not in top-100
Power efficiency	8.58	2.79
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code name	GM107	GF110
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	13 March 2015 (9 years ago)	25 July 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	512
CUDA cores	640	no data
Core clock speed	1096 MHz	651 MHz
Boost clock speed	1176 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,870 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	47.04	41.66
Floating-point processing power	1.505 TFLOPS	1.332 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	48
TMUs	40	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	248 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz	924 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	177.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
VGA аnalog display support	+	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	+	no data
HDMI	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	-
GeForce ShadowPlay	+	-
GPU Boost	2.0	no data
GameWorks	+	-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	-
Optimus	+	-
BatteryBoost	+	-
Ansel	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	+	2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 960M 8.77

Tesla M2090 9.50
+8.3%

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

GTX 960M 32

Tesla M2090 49
+53.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	95 −5.3%	100−110 +5.3%
Full HD	35 +0%	35−40 +0%
1440p	15 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
4K	14 +0%	14−16 +0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

+0%

14−16
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	25 −8%	27−30 +8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −7.7%	14−16 +7.7%
Battlefield 5	30 +0%	30−33 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Far Cry 5	28 −7.1%	30−33 +7.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	31 +3.3%	30−33 −3.3%
Forza Horizon 4	84 −7.1%	90−95 +7.1%
Hitman 3	16−18 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Metro Exodus	31 +3.3%	30−33 −3.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	48 −4.2%	50−55 +4.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −1.7%	60−65 +1.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	31 +3.3%	30−33 −3.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −7.7%	14−16 +7.7%
Battlefield 5	23 −4.3%	24−27 +4.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Far Cry 5	24 +0%	24−27 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	23 −4.3%	24−27 +4.3%
Forza Horizon 4	71 −5.6%	75−80 +5.6%
Hitman 3	16−18 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Metro Exodus	26 −3.8%	27−30 +3.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −3.4%	30−33 +3.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	73 −2.7%	75−80 +2.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −1.7%	60−65 +1.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	11 +10%	10−11 −10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −7.7%	14−16 +7.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Far Cry 5	18 +0%	18−20 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	25 −8%	27−30 +8%
Hitman 3	16−18 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −3.4%	30−33 +3.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14 +0%	14−16 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −1.7%	60−65 +1.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

+0%

24−27
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14 +0%	14−16 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	15 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8 +0%	8−9 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry 5	10 +0%	10−11 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	45 +0%	45−50 +0%
Hitman 3	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Metro Exodus	15 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −7.1%	60−65 +7.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−6.7%

16−18
+6.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6 +0%	6−7 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	7 +0%	7−8 +0%
Hitman 3	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Metro Exodus	8 +0%	8−9 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10 +0%	10−11 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	4 +0%	4−5 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10

+0%

9−10
+0%

This is how GTX 960M and Tesla M2090 compete in popular games:

Tesla M2090 is 5% faster in 900p
A tie in 1080p
Tesla M2090 is 7% faster in 1440p
A tie in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.77	9.50
Recency	13 March 2015	25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	250 Watt