GRID K1 vs GeForce GTX 960M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 960M with GRID K1, including specs and performance data.

GTX 960M
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
8.56
+419%

GTX 960M outperforms GRID K1 by a whopping 419% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking500945
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.01
Power efficiency8.010.89
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGM107GK107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date13 March 2015 (9 years ago)18 March 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,140

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640192 ×4
Core clock speed1096 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1176 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate47.0413.60 ×4
Floating-point processing power1.505 TFLOPS0.3264 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs1616 ×4
TMUs4016 ×4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB ×4
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed2500 MHz891 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s28.51 GB/s ×4
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-
Ansel+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA+3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 960M 8.56
+419%
GRID K1 1.65

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 960M 3367
+418%
GRID K1 650

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p95
+428%
18−20
−428%
Full HD35
+483%
6−7
−483%
1440p15
+650%
2−3
−650%
4K14
+600%
2−3
−600%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data690.00
1440pno data2070.00
4Kno data2070.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Battlefield 5 38
+443%
7−8
−443%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Far Cry 5 28
+460%
5−6
−460%
Fortnite 99
+450%
18−20
−450%
Forza Horizon 4 35
+483%
6−7
−483%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35
+483%
6−7
−483%
Valorant 80−85
+493%
14−16
−493%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Battlefield 5 31
+520%
5−6
−520%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+433%
24−27
−433%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Dota 2 60−65
+520%
10−11
−520%
Far Cry 5 25
+525%
4−5
−525%
Fortnite 40
+471%
7−8
−471%
Forza Horizon 4 31
+520%
5−6
−520%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Grand Theft Auto V 31
+520%
5−6
−520%
Metro Exodus 12
+500%
2−3
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 29
+480%
5−6
−480%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
+500%
4−5
−500%
Valorant 80−85
+493%
14−16
−493%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 26
+420%
5−6
−420%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Dota 2 60−65
+520%
10−11
−520%
Far Cry 5 23
+475%
4−5
−475%
Forza Horizon 4 25
+525%
4−5
−525%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18
+500%
3−4
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+600%
2−3
−600%
Valorant 80−85
+493%
14−16
−493%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 31
+520%
5−6
−520%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+425%
12−14
−425%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+438%
8−9
−438%
Valorant 90−95
+481%
16−18
−481%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 17
+467%
3−4
−467%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry 5 15
+650%
2−3
−650%
Forza Horizon 4 18
+500%
3−4
−500%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18
+500%
3−4
−500%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 20
+567%
3−4
−567%
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+900%
1−2
−900%
Valorant 40−45
+425%
8−9
−425%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 30−33
+500%
5−6
−500%
Far Cry 5 7
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5 0−1

This is how GTX 960M and GRID K1 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 960M is 428% faster in 900p
  • GTX 960M is 483% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 960M is 650% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 960M is 600% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.56 1.65
Recency 13 March 2015 18 March 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 130 Watt

GTX 960M has a 418.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 73.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 960M is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID K1 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 960M is a notebook card while GRID K1 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
GeForce GTX 960M
NVIDIA GRID K1
GRID K1

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1101 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 960M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 7 votes

Rate GRID K1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 960M or GRID K1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.