HD Graphics 400 vs GeForce GTX 960M

Place in the ranking	485	1070
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	8.07	13.04
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code name	GM107	Braswell GT1
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	13 March 2015 (9 years ago)	1 April 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	96
Core clock speed	1096 MHz	320 MHz
Boost clock speed	1176 MHz	640 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	6 Watt
Texture fill rate	47.04	7.680
Floating-point processing power	1.505 TFLOPS	0.1229 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	2
TMUs	40	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x1
Width	no data	IGP
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3L
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
VGA аnalog display support	+	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	+	no data
HDMI	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	-
GeForce ShadowPlay	+	-
GPU Boost	2.0	no data
GameWorks	+	-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	-
Optimus	+	-
BatteryBoost	+	-
Ansel	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.3
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.80
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 960M 8.74
+673%

HD Graphics 400 1.13

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 960M 4318
+860%

HD Graphics 400 450

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	95 +692%	12−14 −692%
Full HD	34 +750%	4−5 −750%
1440p	14 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
4K	13 +1200%	1−2 −1200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16
+1300%

1−2

−1300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	25 +733%	3−4 −733%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +1200%	1−2 −1200%
Battlefield 5	30 +900%	3−4 −900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +800%	2−3 −800%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
Far Cry 5	28 +833%	3−4 −833%
Far Cry New Dawn	31 +675%	4−5 −675%
Forza Horizon 4	84 +740%	10−11 −740%
Hitman 3	16−18 +750%	2−3 −750%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +733%	6−7 −733%
Metro Exodus	31 +675%	4−5 −675%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +700%	3−4 −700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	48 +700%	6−7 −700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +743%	7−8 −743%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	31 +675%	4−5 −675%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +1200%	1−2 −1200%
Battlefield 5	23 +1050%	2−3 −1050%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +800%	2−3 −800%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
Far Cry 5	24 +700%	3−4 −700%
Far Cry New Dawn	23 +1050%	2−3 −1050%
Forza Horizon 4	71 +689%	9−10 −689%
Hitman 3	16−18 +750%	2−3 −750%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +733%	6−7 −733%
Metro Exodus	26 +767%	3−4 −767%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +700%	3−4 −700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +867%	3−4 −867%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	73 +711%	9−10 −711%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +743%	7−8 −743%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	11 +1000%	1−2 −1000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +1200%	1−2 −1200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +800%	2−3 −800%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
Far Cry 5	18 +800%	2−3 −800%
Forza Horizon 4	25 +733%	3−4 −733%
Hitman 3	16−18 +750%	2−3 −750%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +733%	6−7 −733%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +867%	3−4 −867%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +743%	7−8 −743%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

+700%

3−4
−700%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
Far Cry New Dawn	15 +1400%	1−2 −1400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8 +700%	1−2 −700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5	0−1
Far Cry 5	10 +900%	1−2 −900%
Forza Horizon 4	45 +800%	5−6 −800%
Hitman 3	12−14 +1100%	1−2 −1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +800%	2−3 −800%
Metro Exodus	15 +1400%	1−2 −1400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +700%	7−8 −700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16
+1400%

1−2

−1400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	7	0−1
Hitman 3	5−6	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +775%	4−5 −775%
Metro Exodus	8 +700%	1−2 −700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10 +900%	1−2 −900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	4	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +1000%	1−2 −1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
+800%

1−2

−800%

This is how GTX 960M and HD Graphics 400 compete in popular games:

GTX 960M is 692% faster in 900p
GTX 960M is 750% faster in 1080p
GTX 960M is 1300% faster in 1440p
GTX 960M is 1200% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.74	1.13
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	6 Watt

GTX 960M has a 673.5% higher aggregate performance score.

HD Graphics 400, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1150% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 960M is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 960M is a notebook card while HD Graphics 400 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.