Quadro RTX A6000 vs GeForce GTX 660

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 660 with Quadro RTX A6000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 660
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 140 Watt
10.35

RTX A6000 outperforms GTX 660 by a whopping 301% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking40584
Place by popularity69not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.410.49
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGK106Ampere
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 September 2012 (11 years ago)5 October 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $4,649
Current price$172 (0.8x MSRP)$8932 (1.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 660 has 392% better value for money than RTX A6000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96010752
CUDA cores960no data
Core clock speed980 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHz1800 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate78.4 billion/sec625.0
Floating-point performance1,981 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length9.5" (24.1 cm)267 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsOne 6-pin8-pin EPS
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB48 GB
Memory bus width192-bit GDDR5384 Bit
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/s16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.2 GB/s768.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort4x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+no data
3D Gaming+no data
3D Vision+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 660 10.35
RTX A6000 41.50
+301%

Quadro RTX A6000 outperforms GeForce GTX 660 by 301% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 660 5040
RTX A6000 27511
+446%

Quadro RTX A6000 outperforms GeForce GTX 660 by 446% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD47
−255%
167
+255%
1440p30−35
−330%
129
+330%
4K27−30
−315%
112
+315%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
−292%
290−300
+292%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
−289%
280−290
+289%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
−289%
280−290
+289%
Battlefield 5 130−140
−276%
500−550
+276%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
−257%
300−310
+257%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
−292%
290−300
+292%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−293%
350−400
+293%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
−292%
400−450
+292%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−287%
600−650
+287%
Hitman 3 85−90
−253%
300−310
+253%
Horizon Zero Dawn 248
−283%
950−1000
+283%
Metro Exodus 110−120
−288%
450−500
+288%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
−257%
350−400
+257%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 300
−300%
1200−1250
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−105
−300%
400−450
+300%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
−289%
280−290
+289%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
−289%
280−290
+289%
Battlefield 5 130−140
−276%
500−550
+276%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
−257%
300−310
+257%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
−292%
290−300
+292%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−293%
350−400
+293%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
−292%
400−450
+292%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−287%
600−650
+287%
Hitman 3 85−90
−253%
300−310
+253%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
−285%
650−700
+285%
Metro Exodus 34
−282%
130−140
+282%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
−257%
350−400
+257%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 293
−292%
1150−1200
+292%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 307
−291%
1200−1250
+291%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−105
−300%
400−450
+300%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
−289%
280−290
+289%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
−289%
280−290
+289%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
−257%
300−310
+257%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
−292%
290−300
+292%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−293%
350−400
+293%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−287%
600−650
+287%
Horizon Zero Dawn 224
−279%
850−900
+279%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 288
−299%
1150−1200
+299%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 180
−289%
700−750
+289%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−105
−300%
400−450
+300%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
−257%
350−400
+257%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−270%
300−310
+270%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
−261%
350−400
+261%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−300%
180−190
+300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
−291%
180−190
+291%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
−291%
250−260
+291%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−282%
130−140
+282%
Far Cry 5 52
−285%
200−210
+285%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−298%
350−400
+298%
Hitman 3 50−55
−289%
210−220
+289%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210
−281%
800−850
+281%
Metro Exodus 63
−297%
250−260
+297%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 247
−285%
950−1000
+285%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
−287%
240−250
+287%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−295%
150−160
+295%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
−289%
280−290
+289%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−281%
160−170
+281%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−300%
140−150
+300%
Hitman 3 30−35
−282%
130−140
+282%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−296%
210−220
+296%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−294%
130−140
+294%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 146
−277%
550−600
+277%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−279%
110−120
+279%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−270%
100−105
+270%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−297%
230−240
+297%
Horizon Zero Dawn 137
−265%
500−550
+265%
Metro Exodus 63
−297%
250−260
+297%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−281%
80−85
+281%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−278%
140−150
+278%

This is how GTX 660 and RTX A6000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A6000 is 255% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A6000 is 330% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A6000 is 315% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.35 41.50
Recency 6 September 2012 5 October 2020
Cost $229 $4649
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 300 Watt

The Quadro RTX A6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 660 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 660 is a desktop card while Quadro RTX A6000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
GeForce GTX 660
NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000
Quadro RTX A6000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 4025 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 450 votes

Rate Quadro RTX A6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.