GX-210JA vs EPYC 7351P

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7351P and GX-210JA processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	409	3292
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	5.50	no data
Market segment	Server	Laptop
Series	AMD EPYC	AMD
Power efficiency	8.99	2.52
Architecture codename	Naples (2017−2018)	Temash (2013)
Release date	29 June 2017 (7 years ago)	23 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$750	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7351P and GX-210JA basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	16 (Hexadeca-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	32	2
Base clock speed	2.4 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2.9 GHz	1 GHz
Multiplier	24	no data
L1 cache	96K (per core)	128 KB
L2 cache	512K (per core)	1 MB
L3 cache	64 MB (shared)	no data
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Die size	192 mm2	no data
Number of transistors	4,800 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	+	-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7351P and GX-210JA compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	no data
Socket	TR4	FT3 BGA
Power consumption (TDP)	170 Watt	6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7351P and GX-210JA. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7351P and GX-210JA are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7351P and GX-210JA. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4 Eight-channel	DDR3
Maximum memory size	2 TiB	no data
Max memory channels	8	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	170.671 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7351P and GX-210JA.

PCIe version	3.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	128	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	16.15	0.16
Recency	29 June 2017	23 May 2013
Physical cores	16	2
Threads	32	2
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	170 Watt	6 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7351P and GX-210JA, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---